Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Practice Tip: Use TACT

Much to the chagrin of class action litigation proponents, the expansive reach of mandatory arbitration has gained a strong foothold in recent years, due to the overwhelmingly pro-arbitration precedent established by the Supreme Court in its Concepcion and Italian Colors decisions, which express a clear federal policy in favor of enforcing class action waivers contained in arbitration agreements.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In April 2014, the media ignited a firestorm of controversy over General Mills’ decision to modify its online Privacy Policy and Legal Terms to include a mandatory arbitration provision. The proviso required consumers who downloaded or printed coupons, “joined an online community,” subscribed to an e-mail newsletter, redeemed a promotion, or participated in any “offering” to forego their right to sue the company in court and instead submit to private, binding arbitration to resolve any disputes with the company. In the face of the outcry over this policy change, the company reversed course and restored its prior legal terms, which contained no mention of arbitration.

To continue reading,
become a free ALM digital reader

Benefits include:

*May exclude premium content

Read These Next