Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cybersecurity E-Discovery Litigation Technology Media and Telecom

Legal Tech: Early 2018 E-Discovery Case Law Review: Sanctions and the Reasonableness of TAR

Cases from early 2018 that stand above many others for the impact they will have on both sanctions and e-discovery review processes moving forward.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Klipsch Group v. ePRO E-Commerce, Schmalz v. Village of Riverside, and In Re Broiler Chickens reinforce the distinction between sanctions based on “intent to deprive” and gross negligence, as well as defining what a reasonable technology-assisted review (TAR) process should look like. These three cases from early 2018 stand above many others for the impact they will have on both sanctions and e-discovery review processes moving forward.

This premium content is locked for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN CYBERSECURITY, PRIVACY, INFORMATION GOVERNANCE, LEGAL TECHNOLOGY AND E-DISCOVERY.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on cyber threats, data breaches, and legal technology
  • Tap into expert guidance from top legal tech lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next