Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a new set of lease accounting standards, known as Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, which went into effect earlier this year. Most significantly, publicly traded companies are now obligated to list all leases of 12 months or longer on their balance sheets as both assets and liabilities. Large private companies will follow suit in 2020.
Traditionally, such leases have been condensed into the footnotes of company's accounting disclosures as off-balance-sheet operating expenses. Altering the categorization of such leases as debt rather than operating expenses will result in trillions of dollars to be transferred onto company books and, consequently, significant increases in company leverage, a key measure when evaluating a company's risk.
Under the new standards, companies are required to record all "leases" (except those with terms of less than one year) on their balance sheets as a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability. Whether a contract is a lease rests on two issues: whether the contract depends on the use of an "identified asset" and whether the contract conveys the "right to control the use of the identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration." FASB, ASC 842-10-15-3. If either element is missing, the contract is not a "lease" for financial accounting purposes. If a contract is not deemed to be or contain a lease, such contract will be deemed off-balance-sheet. Therefore, determining whether a contract is a lease under the new standards demands closer analysis.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.