Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Air quality standards are frequently not satisfactorily addressed in leases, if they are addressed at all. Most sophisticated office leases will require a landlord to provide certain temperature and humidity levels during specified times. A typical clause provides that the landlord will provide HVAC service from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and perhaps from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Sometimes the actual dry and wet bulb temperature and humidity levels will be specified, and in other instances the lease will simply provide that temperature and humidity levels will be in accordance with first-class standards. These provisions, however, do not address air quality, including cooking odors or exhaust fumes which may infiltrate the building's air system and end up in a tenant's space.
A lease may have boilerplate provisions requiring the landlord to comply with applicable laws, but such provisions do not necessarily require the landlord to provide its tenant with odor-free space. The savvy tenant will require the landlord to provide, at a minimum, that the air quality in the tenant's space will be in accordance with standards for first-class office buildings and further require the landlord to take corrective actions at its expense in the event that the air quality does not match such standards. It is particularly important for lower-floor tenants of urban properties to insert provisions with respect to fumes, especially cooking odors. In order to ensure that the landlord does not correct air quality problems at the tenant's expense, the expense pass-through provisions of the lease should specifically exclude capital expenditures. This exclusion will provide the landlord with an incentive to hold other tenants or the owners of adjoining properties accountable if their activities are the cause of the aggrieved tenant's air quality problems.
Air quality standards are frequently not satisfactorily addressed in leases, if they are addressed at all. Most sophisticated office leases will require a landlord to provide certain temperature and humidity levels during specified times. A typical clause provides that the landlord will provide HVAC service from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and perhaps from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Saturdays. Sometimes the actual dry and wet bulb temperature and humidity levels will be specified, and in other instances the lease will simply provide that temperature and humidity levels will be in accordance with first-class standards. These provisions, however, do not address air quality, including cooking odors or exhaust fumes which may infiltrate the building's air system and end up in a tenant's space.
A lease may have boilerplate provisions requiring the landlord to comply with applicable laws, but such provisions do not necessarily require the landlord to provide its tenant with odor-free space. The savvy tenant will require the landlord to provide, at a minimum, that the air quality in the tenant's space will be in accordance with standards for first-class office buildings and further require the landlord to take corrective actions at its expense in the event that the air quality does not match such standards. It is particularly important for lower-floor tenants of urban properties to insert provisions with respect to fumes, especially cooking odors. In order to ensure that the landlord does not correct air quality problems at the tenant's expense, the expense pass-through provisions of the lease should specifically exclude capital expenditures. This exclusion will provide the landlord with an incentive to hold other tenants or the owners of adjoining properties accountable if their activities are the cause of the aggrieved tenant's air quality problems.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.