Regulation

Every decision to onboard a client, partner, lateral hire, contractor, consultant or expert witness carries risk. Yet despite the increasing complexity of that risk, many firms continue to rely on onboarding practices that have not kept pace with the digital world in which their clients and people operate. The result is a widening gap between how risk actually manifests today and how it is assessed at the point of onboarding.

The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division has moved at warp speed to deploy its first-ever whistleblower rewards program, marking a significant evolution in the division’s longstanding efforts to detect and prosecute criminal cartel conduct.

Companies and individuals prosecuted for tariff-related offenses are often surprised. In addition to the overall complexity of the regulatory framework, the ambiguity of tariff regulations frequently creates confusion about how to comply. The same confusion that leads to charges of non-compliance, however, can also be the source of an effective defense to those charges. This article examines potential defenses in tariff evasion and non-compliance prosecutions and offers practical guidance for counsel preparing to litigate them.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s new corporate enforcement guidelines released in March give companies a clearer idea of how federal prosecutors will handle cases in which companies self-report misconduct, white-collar defense attorneys said.

Companies will face more aggressive bribery and corporate fraud enforcement this year, according to a new report, which urges C-suites to mitigate risk by swiftly self-reporting potential wrongdoing and launching remediation efforts.

Interpretive guidance defining cryptocurrency assets released last month by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission goes a long way to providing the regulatory clarity the Trump administration has been promising the industry, legal experts said.

New York is one of the first states to adopt laws to regulate artificial intelligence use in advertising and to strengthen post-mortem publicity rights regarding AI-generated replicas and “synthetic performers.” Given the state’s role as a bellwether for consumer-protection and advertising regulation, these new laws, combined with the state’s broader AI legislative framework, represent a shift toward transparency, consent and accountability.

State app store age verification regimes do more than reallocate responsibility between platforms and developers. They create a new data supply chain for age knowledge, one that can move COPPA questions from “do we ask age?” to “what do we do when the platform tells us?” The teams that handle this best will treat platform age signals as sensitive compliance inputs: minimize them, tightly control where they flow, and design product behavior so that minors do not trigger unnecessary collection or disclosure.