Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Last month's sidebar article on “profitability levers” invited ' well, predicted ' corrections to my hearsay report on the origin of the RULES acronym for profitability factors: realization, utilization, leverage, expense control, and speed of billing and collection.
Joseph A. Bailey of PwC, a textbook coauthor cited in that sidebar and also the coauthor of this month's feature article on globalizing law firm operations, concurs with my source's belief that Bob Arndt was one of the RULES originators.
Hearsay evidence is questionable for good reason, however. I reported my original source's suggestion for Arndt's acronymizing accomplice as “Raven Horst.” Raven is an unusual enough first name that I would ordinarily have challenged it; but, as luck would have it, my kid had just recently introduced me to a school friend with that name. In any case, Bailey kindly informs me that the individual in question is Jim Rabenhorst.
That said, Bailey thinks Arndt's actual partner was Corky Hoffman! But who knows, perhaps both of them joined Arndt for that legendary lunch.
Bailey also indicates that Bob Arndt was talking up the RULES factors and their interdependence way back in the early 1980s, a full decade earlier than my original source suggested. Few lunchtime jottings withstand the test of time so well.
' Joe Danowsky
Last month's sidebar article on “profitability levers” invited ' well, predicted ' corrections to my hearsay report on the origin of the RULES acronym for profitability factors: realization, utilization, leverage, expense control, and speed of billing and collection.
Joseph A. Bailey of PwC, a textbook coauthor cited in that sidebar and also the coauthor of this month's feature article on globalizing law firm operations, concurs with my source's belief that Bob Arndt was one of the RULES originators.
Hearsay evidence is questionable for good reason, however. I reported my original source's suggestion for Arndt's acronymizing accomplice as “Raven Horst.” Raven is an unusual enough first name that I would ordinarily have challenged it; but, as luck would have it, my kid had just recently introduced me to a school friend with that name. In any case, Bailey kindly informs me that the individual in question is Jim Rabenhorst.
That said, Bailey thinks Arndt's actual partner was Corky Hoffman! But who knows, perhaps both of them joined Arndt for that legendary lunch.
Bailey also indicates that Bob Arndt was talking up the RULES factors and their interdependence way back in the early 1980s, a full decade earlier than my original source suggested. Few lunchtime jottings withstand the test of time so well.
' Joe Danowsky
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.