Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ninth Circuit Pre-empts State Law Allowing Assignee to Void Preferential Transfers
The Ninth Circuit has ruled that the Bankruptcy Code preempts California Civ. Proc. Code ' 1800(b), which permits an assignee selected by the debtor to void preferential transfers that could not be voided by an unsecured creditor. Sherwood Partners Inc. v. Lycos Inc., No. 03-55247 (Jan. 12).
In reversing the district court, the Ninth Circuit ruled that statutes “that give state assignees or trustees avoidance powers beyond those that may be exercised by individual creditors trench too close upon the exercise of the federal bankruptcy power.” The court concluded that “Congress has thought carefully about how collective insolvency proceedings are to be conducted and set both substantive standards and elaborate procedural protections to ensure a result that is fair to debtors and creditors alike. The exercise of the preference avoidance power by [an assignee] under the authority of section 1800 is inconsistent with the enactment and operation of the federal bankruptcy system and is therefore pre-empted.”
Ninth Circuit Pre-empts State Law Allowing Assignee to Void Preferential Transfers
The Ninth Circuit has ruled that the Bankruptcy Code preempts California Civ. Proc. Code ' 1800(b), which permits an assignee selected by the debtor to void preferential transfers that could not be voided by an unsecured creditor. Sherwood Partners Inc. v. Lycos Inc., No. 03-55247 (Jan. 12).
In reversing the district court, the Ninth Circuit ruled that statutes “that give state assignees or trustees avoidance powers beyond those that may be exercised by individual creditors trench too close upon the exercise of the federal bankruptcy power.” The court concluded that “Congress has thought carefully about how collective insolvency proceedings are to be conducted and set both substantive standards and elaborate procedural protections to ensure a result that is fair to debtors and creditors alike. The exercise of the preference avoidance power by [an assignee] under the authority of section 1800 is inconsistent with the enactment and operation of the federal bankruptcy system and is therefore pre-empted.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.