Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Spotlight: Beware of Real Estate 'Icebergs'

By Jack Garson
October 04, 2005

If you own a shopping center, a regional mall or a strip of stores in an office building, you very likely anticipate the more frequent business problems: Tenants don't pay their rent on time or don't pay the rent at all; tenants alter their premises, install signs or assign their leases without your consent; tenants use the wrong parking spaces or the wrong dumpsters. Generally, these common problems are an expected part of owning retail property. Upcoming Spotlight columns will discuss some of these problems. But for now, we address something unanticipated …

The Unusual Suspects ' Hazmats

What's often overlooked is the unexpected ' the real estate “icebergs.” These are the unanticipated problems that can literally sink the value of a property.

A hazardous materials discharge is a notorious real estate iceberg. It can reduce property values and scare off purchasers and lenders. Gas stations and dry cleaners are common culprits. Any business that uses underground fuel tanks, solvents or a variety of other chemicals can discharge hazards materials.

When a hazmat has been discharged, you may be required to notify government agencies, engage in extensive testing, limit uses of your property and perform expensive remediation. Lenders likely will require that you escrow estimated remediation costs, and provide personal guarantees of remediation. Purchasers will require indemnification and a lower sales price.

Avoiding the hazmat iceberg requires thorough due diligence when purchasing a property, not just a review of the historical uses of the property. You may need to sample soil and ground waste and inspect buildings and equipment. Once you own the property, you should restrict the use of dangerous materials, inspect for violations and aggressively pursue violators. Otherwise, you may be stuck with a remediation process that lasts for years and costs you a small fortune.

Next month's column will explore a few more icebergs.



Jack Garson

If you own a shopping center, a regional mall or a strip of stores in an office building, you very likely anticipate the more frequent business problems: Tenants don't pay their rent on time or don't pay the rent at all; tenants alter their premises, install signs or assign their leases without your consent; tenants use the wrong parking spaces or the wrong dumpsters. Generally, these common problems are an expected part of owning retail property. Upcoming Spotlight columns will discuss some of these problems. But for now, we address something unanticipated …

The Unusual Suspects ' Hazmats

What's often overlooked is the unexpected ' the real estate “icebergs.” These are the unanticipated problems that can literally sink the value of a property.

A hazardous materials discharge is a notorious real estate iceberg. It can reduce property values and scare off purchasers and lenders. Gas stations and dry cleaners are common culprits. Any business that uses underground fuel tanks, solvents or a variety of other chemicals can discharge hazards materials.

When a hazmat has been discharged, you may be required to notify government agencies, engage in extensive testing, limit uses of your property and perform expensive remediation. Lenders likely will require that you escrow estimated remediation costs, and provide personal guarantees of remediation. Purchasers will require indemnification and a lower sales price.

Avoiding the hazmat iceberg requires thorough due diligence when purchasing a property, not just a review of the historical uses of the property. You may need to sample soil and ground waste and inspect buildings and equipment. Once you own the property, you should restrict the use of dangerous materials, inspect for violations and aggressively pursue violators. Otherwise, you may be stuck with a remediation process that lasts for years and costs you a small fortune.

Next month's column will explore a few more icebergs.



Jack Garson

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.