Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Akin Gump to Open Beijing Office

By Amanda Bronstad
September 26, 2006
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld is planning to open an office in Beijing within the next 60 to 90 days, according to the firm's chairman, R. Bruce McLean.

The office would be the first in mainland China for the Washington-based firm, which has more than 900 lawyers in 15 offices, including international outposts in London; Moscow; Brussels, Belgium; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; and Taipei, Taiwan.

“We've been looking at the China market for quite some time,” McLean said. “The things we think we'll bring to the market are better served in Beijing and China than other cities.”

Specifically, the firm plans to provide legal work for Chinese companies in the international trade and energy sectors, both of which have strong connections to the governmental entities based in Beijing, he said. The firm also intends to staff intellectual property lawyers at the Beijing office.

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?