Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALIFORNIA
Software Executive Guilty of Obstructing SEC Investigation
The defendant, the former owner of one California software company as well as a former employee of a second, pleaded guilty to obstructing an SEC investigation into transactions between the companies, according to the DOJ. The defendant reportedly admitted that on two occasions he falsely testified before the SEC when he asserted that he did know about 'finder's fees' paid from one company to the other and also when he questioned the authenticity of his own signature on certain documents. According to prosecutors, the finder's fees were actually payments made in exchange for the defendant's signatures on bogus documents. The defendant also admitted that he knew that some of the contracts involved in the scheme were backdated to make it appear that the deals had been concluded in prior fiscal quarters. (United States v. Whitt, No. 04-2605-11, S.D. Ca.)
CONNECTICUT
Pollster Guilty of Falsifying Polls and Surveys
The owner and operator of a Connecticut polling and survey company pleaded guilty to wire fraud related to a scheme to falsify polling results, according to the U.S. Attorney's office. The pollster admitted to falsifying polling results in order to meet deadlines or to satisfy other customer requirements that the company could not meet. Falsifications reportedly ranged from changing the demographic information associated with the data collected, such as gender or political affiliation, to fabricating surveys in their entirety. (United States v. Costin, No. 05-00038, D. Conn.)
MICHIGAN
First Spammer Sentenced Under Federal 'CAN-SPAM' Law
A Michigan man who was the first person charged under 'CAN-SPAM,' 15 U.S.C. ' 7701 et seq., the federal law making certain kinds of fraudulent or unauthorized mass electronic mailings federal crimes, was sentenced to 3 years in prison, according to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. The defendant reportedly developed a business to market and sell diet aids and prescription medications through the use of 'spam' bulk commercial e-mail. The scheme made over $350,000 in a 4-month period before the defendant was arrested in early 2004. (United States v. Lin, No. 04-80863, E.D. Mich.)
NEW JERSEY
Former Company President Guilty of Conspiracy and Money Laundering
The former president of a publicly traded vertical marketing company pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud and to one count of money laundering, according to the U.S. Attorney's office. He admitted to fraudulently issuing company stock to individuals the company characterized as 'consultants' when in fact the stock was issued to settle other debts, such as paying for marketing services or other business expenses. The company did this in order to take advantage of an SEC rule allowing the company to issue free-trading stock to individuals performing legitimate advisory services at a time when the company's stock would have otherwise been restricted. The defendant also admitted to laundering the proceeds of a separate fraud scheme by washing the funds through a bank account opened in the name of a nonexistent company. (United States v. Sgarlat, No. 06-00723, D.N.J.)
Business Crimes Bulletin and In the Courts were written by Thomas M. Craig, an Associate at Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, and Associate Editor of this newsletter.
CALIFORNIA
Software Executive Guilty of Obstructing SEC Investigation
The defendant, the former owner of one California software company as well as a former employee of a second, pleaded guilty to obstructing an SEC investigation into transactions between the companies, according to the DOJ. The defendant reportedly admitted that on two occasions he falsely testified before the SEC when he asserted that he did know about 'finder's fees' paid from one company to the other and also when he questioned the authenticity of his own signature on certain documents. According to prosecutors, the finder's fees were actually payments made in exchange for the defendant's signatures on bogus documents. The defendant also admitted that he knew that some of the contracts involved in the scheme were backdated to make it appear that the deals had been concluded in prior fiscal quarters. (United States v. Whitt, No. 04-2605-11, S.D. Ca.)
CONNECTICUT
Pollster Guilty of Falsifying Polls and Surveys
The owner and operator of a Connecticut polling and survey company pleaded guilty to wire fraud related to a scheme to falsify polling results, according to the U.S. Attorney's office. The pollster admitted to falsifying polling results in order to meet deadlines or to satisfy other customer requirements that the company could not meet. Falsifications reportedly ranged from changing the demographic information associated with the data collected, such as gender or political affiliation, to fabricating surveys in their entirety. (United States v. Costin, No. 05-00038, D. Conn.)
MICHIGAN
First Spammer Sentenced Under Federal 'CAN-SPAM' Law
A Michigan man who was the first person charged under 'CAN-SPAM,' 15 U.S.C. ' 7701 et seq., the federal law making certain kinds of fraudulent or unauthorized mass electronic mailings federal crimes, was sentenced to 3 years in prison, according to the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. The defendant reportedly developed a business to market and sell diet aids and prescription medications through the use of 'spam' bulk commercial e-mail. The scheme made over $350,000 in a 4-month period before the defendant was arrested in early 2004. (United States v. Lin, No. 04-80863, E.D. Mich.)
NEW JERSEY
Former Company President Guilty of Conspiracy and Money Laundering
The former president of a publicly traded vertical marketing company pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities and wire fraud and to one count of money laundering, according to the U.S. Attorney's office. He admitted to fraudulently issuing company stock to individuals the company characterized as 'consultants' when in fact the stock was issued to settle other debts, such as paying for marketing services or other business expenses. The company did this in order to take advantage of an SEC rule allowing the company to issue free-trading stock to individuals performing legitimate advisory services at a time when the company's stock would have otherwise been restricted. The defendant also admitted to laundering the proceeds of a separate fraud scheme by washing the funds through a bank account opened in the name of a nonexistent company. (United States v. Sgarlat, No. 06-00723, D.N.J.)
Business Crimes Bulletin and In the Courts were written by Thomas M. Craig, an Associate at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.