Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALIFORNIA
Jail Term for Executive Guilty of Price Fixing
An executive of a major electronics company pled guilty to violating the Sherman Act and has agreed to serve 8 months in prison and pay a $250,000 fine, according to the DOJ. The executive is the 13th individual charged in an ongoing investigation into price fixing in the $7 billion market for dynamic random access memory (DRAM), a common computer component. The executive is alleged to have conspired with unnamed employees from other memory makers to fix the prices of DRAM sold to certain manufacturers in 2001 and 2002. (United States v. Quinn, No. 06-cr-00635, N.D. Ca.)
Chairman and Senior Counsel Charged for Role in Improper Investigation
The former chairman of a major U.S. technology company, the company's former senior counsel, and three others have been charged in California state court with conspiracy, wire fraud, illegally taking copying and using computer data, and using personal identifying information without authorization, according to a four count information filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court. A declaration filed in support of the felony complaint indicates that the charges are related to an internal investigation conducted by the company to determine if a member of its Board of Directors was leaking confidential information to the media. It is alleged that in the course of that investigation, investigators obtained individual's telephone records without their consent by contacting the individual's telephone carrier and falsely representing themselves as the actual customer, a practice known as 'pretexting.' (State v. Dunn, DA No: 061027481, Sup. Ct. Ca.)
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Thomas M. Craig, an Associate at Williams & Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, and Associate Editor of this newsletter.
CALIFORNIA
Jail Term for Executive Guilty of Price Fixing
An executive of a major electronics company pled guilty to violating the Sherman Act and has agreed to serve 8 months in prison and pay a $250,000 fine, according to the DOJ. The executive is the 13th individual charged in an ongoing investigation into price fixing in the $7 billion market for dynamic random access memory (DRAM), a common computer component. The executive is alleged to have conspired with unnamed employees from other memory makers to fix the prices of DRAM sold to certain manufacturers in 2001 and 2002. (United States v. Quinn, No. 06-cr-00635, N.D. Ca.)
Chairman and Senior Counsel Charged for Role in Improper Investigation
The former chairman of a major U.S. technology company, the company's former senior counsel, and three others have been charged in California state court with conspiracy, wire fraud, illegally taking copying and using computer data, and using personal identifying information without authorization, according to a four count information filed in Santa Clara County Superior Court. A declaration filed in support of the felony complaint indicates that the charges are related to an internal investigation conducted by the company to determine if a member of its Board of Directors was leaking confidential information to the media. It is alleged that in the course of that investigation, investigators obtained individual's telephone records without their consent by contacting the individual's telephone carrier and falsely representing themselves as the actual customer, a practice known as 'pretexting.' (State v. Dunn, DA No: 061027481, Sup. Ct. Ca.)
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Thomas M. Craig, an Associate at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.