Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Knowledge That Discharge Was into U.S. Waters Not Necessary for a Clean Water Act Conviction
In United States v. Cooper, 05-4956 (4th Cir. Mar 28, 2007), the Fourth Circuit held that the government need not show that a defendant was aware that pollutants were discharged in 'waters of the United States' to sustain a Clean Water Act conviction.
Defendant, the owner of a trailer park, was convicted at trial on nine counts of knowingly discharging a pollutant into waters of the United States in violation of the Clean Water Act. He appealed, pointing out that the government failed to prove that he knew that the stream he discharged into had a significant nexus to a navigable water, and was therefore waters of the United States. He argued that the statute requires proof that he was aware of the federal government's jurisdiction over the water. The Fourth Circuit disagreed and upheld his conviction, holding that the government need not establish the defendant's knowledge of the jurisdictional status of the waters affected to establish a violation of the Clean Water Act.
Knowledge That Discharge Was into U.S. Waters Not Necessary for a Clean Water Act Conviction
In United States v. Cooper, 05-4956 (4th Cir. Mar 28, 2007), the Fourth Circuit held that the government need not show that a defendant was aware that pollutants were discharged in 'waters of the United States' to sustain a Clean Water Act conviction.
Defendant, the owner of a trailer park, was convicted at trial on nine counts of knowingly discharging a pollutant into waters of the United States in violation of the Clean Water Act. He appealed, pointing out that the government failed to prove that he knew that the stream he discharged into had a significant nexus to a navigable water, and was therefore waters of the United States. He argued that the statute requires proof that he was aware of the federal government's jurisdiction over the water. The Fourth Circuit disagreed and upheld his conviction, holding that the government need not establish the defendant's knowledge of the jurisdictional status of the waters affected to establish a violation of the Clean Water Act.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.