Corporate Employees Need Protection from Overzealous Prosecutors

In cases my firm has handled in the past year, federal prosecutors, by direct demands or more subtle means, have caused two senior corporate executives to lose their jobs even though neither was charged with a crime. For regulated financial institutions, the practice by government agencies of obtaining agreements that bar non-party individuals from employment has become so prevalent that it has a name: 'backdoor prohibitions.' The Department of Justice (DOJ) seems to have adopted a similar practice of 'blacklisting,' even though Congress has never authorized it.

In our cases, the prosecutors ' presumably carrying out the McNulty Memorandum's directive to determine if the corporation under investigation was cooperating adequately ' told company lawyers that the corporation appeared to be 'protecting the culpable employees' by (in the words of the McNulty Memorandum) 'retaining the [executives] without sanction.' Neither of our clients had any prior brush with the law, neither has any criminal 'associations,' and neither is alleged to be directly involved with unlawful activity. Nonetheless, their corporate employers, to avoid indictment or obtain a deferred-prosecution agreement, acceded to prosecutors' wishes and terminated the employment of our clients.