Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
California Court Certifies Contact-Lens Solution Class
A California state trial judge has certified a class of consumers who purchased contact lens solution blamed for causing eye infections that can lead to blindness. The November ruling, in a case against Abbot Medical Optics Inc., came just six months after the California Supreme Court lowered the standing requirements for consumer class actions, in the case of In re Tobacco II Cases. That decision settled a question created by the passage of California's Proposition 64, a 2004 ballot initiative intended to curb consumer cases filed under California's unfair competition law; it requires that plaintiffs show they had suffered an actual injury. The tobacco case held that class actions alleging consumer fraud may go forward even though each and every class member has not suffered actual injuries because of deceptive advertising.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.