Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Decision of Note</b> Copyright License From Less than All U.S. Owners Bars Claim of Foreign Infringement

By Stan Soocher
February 28, 2012

The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada decided ' in an ongoing dispute over the musical Jersey Boys ' that a license obtained from less than all the owners of a U.S. copyright is sufficient to defeat a claim for infringement of the work in a foreign country that itself requires permission from all the owners of the copyright for a license to be valid. Corbello v. DeVito, 2:08-cv-00867.

The litigation over Jersey Boys, a musical about the 1960s vocal group the Four Seasons, involves a suit by Donna Corbello, the widow of attorney/journalist Rex Woodard, who co-authored an unpublished autobiography of original Four Seasons member Tommy DeVito. DeVito granted a license to use his autobiographical materials to Four Seasons co-founders Bob Gaudio and Frankie Valli, who are behind the musical's production. (For more on the case, see, “'Jersey Boys' Case Considers Licensing of Underlying Rights,” Entertainment Law & Finance, Dec. 2011, p. 1., http://bit.ly/w17Kha.)

District Judge Robert C. Jones noted in his ruling regarding Corbello's infringement claims over performances of the musical in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom: “The precise question presented here is whether the validity of a copyright license is more akin to ownership or infringement for the purposes of an infringement action. The answer to this question is critical, because in the U.S. a license obtained from fewer than all joint owners protects a licensee from an infringement action, i.e., such a license is valid, but in the Commonwealth countries, such a license appears to be a nullity '.”

Gaudio and DeVito, along with Jersey Boys' writers and producers, had moved for summary judgment on the issue. Judge Jones found: “In short, for the purposes of an infringement action, licensing is more akin to ownership than infringement. ' And once one has been declared to be a licensee under the law of the appropriate jurisdiction, the issue is settled, and the person is a licensee for the purposes of an infringement action under the law of any other jurisdiction. Because Movants had valid licenses or sublicenses to exploit the Work under U.S. law, the foreign infringement claims fail.”

On a different issue, Judge Jones ruled the Nevada federal court could exercise personal jurisdiction over Jersey Boys Records, which has released a cast soundtrack album that is sold at the musical's Las Vegas performances. But Judge Jones found on Corbello's claim of direct infringement against the label: “The Cast Album consists mainly of Four Seasons songs, plus a few minutes of dialogue. The [DeVito autobiography] Work is a 274-page autobiography. The similarity between the two ' is negligible.”

DeVito remained a defendant in the suit, on Corbello's claims against him that include infringement, breach of contract and fraud.


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada decided ' in an ongoing dispute over the musical Jersey Boys ' that a license obtained from less than all the owners of a U.S. copyright is sufficient to defeat a claim for infringement of the work in a foreign country that itself requires permission from all the owners of the copyright for a license to be valid. Corbello v. DeVito, 2:08-cv-00867.

The litigation over Jersey Boys, a musical about the 1960s vocal group the Four Seasons, involves a suit by Donna Corbello, the widow of attorney/journalist Rex Woodard, who co-authored an unpublished autobiography of original Four Seasons member Tommy DeVito. DeVito granted a license to use his autobiographical materials to Four Seasons co-founders Bob Gaudio and Frankie Valli, who are behind the musical's production. (For more on the case, see, “'Jersey Boys' Case Considers Licensing of Underlying Rights,” Entertainment Law & Finance, Dec. 2011, p. 1., http://bit.ly/w17Kha.)

District Judge Robert C. Jones noted in his ruling regarding Corbello's infringement claims over performances of the musical in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom: “The precise question presented here is whether the validity of a copyright license is more akin to ownership or infringement for the purposes of an infringement action. The answer to this question is critical, because in the U.S. a license obtained from fewer than all joint owners protects a licensee from an infringement action, i.e., such a license is valid, but in the Commonwealth countries, such a license appears to be a nullity '.”

Gaudio and DeVito, along with Jersey Boys' writers and producers, had moved for summary judgment on the issue. Judge Jones found: “In short, for the purposes of an infringement action, licensing is more akin to ownership than infringement. ' And once one has been declared to be a licensee under the law of the appropriate jurisdiction, the issue is settled, and the person is a licensee for the purposes of an infringement action under the law of any other jurisdiction. Because Movants had valid licenses or sublicenses to exploit the Work under U.S. law, the foreign infringement claims fail.”

On a different issue, Judge Jones ruled the Nevada federal court could exercise personal jurisdiction over Jersey Boys Records, which has released a cast soundtrack album that is sold at the musical's Las Vegas performances. But Judge Jones found on Corbello's claim of direct infringement against the label: “The Cast Album consists mainly of Four Seasons songs, plus a few minutes of dialogue. The [DeVito autobiography] Work is a 274-page autobiography. The similarity between the two ' is negligible.”

DeVito remained a defendant in the suit, on Corbello's claims against him that include infringement, breach of contract and fraud.


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?