Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FLORIDA
Second Government FCA Settlement Brings Total Government Recoveries to $217.5 Million
On April 3, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a second False Claims Act (FCA) settlement ' totaling $137.5 million ' with Tampa, FL-based Wellcare Health Plans Inc. (Wellcare), arising from the government's criminal and civil investigation of Wellcare that commenced in 2006. The government's earlier Wellcare settlement, in the form of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement that included restitution and forfeiture commitments totaling $80 million, was concluded on May 5, 2009.
Specifically, the settlement announced on April 3 resolves four whistleblower lawsuits filed pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the FCA. The qui tam suits alleged multiple schemes involving Medicare and Medicaid, including retention of overpayments and falsification of data. According to the government's release, Wellcare provides managed health care services for roughly 2.6 million beneficiaries of these programs across the country.
As part of the settlement, the four whistleblowers ' referred to as “relators” under the FCA ' received $25.41 million of the settlement, with over 80% of that total allocated to a former Wellcare financial analyst, as the analyst's lawsuit triggered the government's investigation. The remainder of the settlement will be split among the United States and nine separate states.
In announcing the settlement, Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Civil Division, made the following comments: “Government health plans increasingly rely on managed care organizations to provide patient care. This case illustrates our commitment to ensur[ing] that government funds are in fact used to render care and not to line the pockets of those more concerned with the bottom line.”
Additionally, Robert E. O'Neill, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, had the following to say about the settlement: “The monies recovered in restitution and from this settlement agreement will go to the federal and state programs which suffered these losses, while the forfeited funds will go to law enforcement to help fund future investigations,” adding that “[i]n an era of decreasing federal and state budgets, and increasing healthcare costs, we must pursue all available civil remedies to recover losses suffered by government healthcare programs. This settlement should serve as notice to those defrauding state and federal healthcare programs that, in addition to appropriate criminal prosecutions, we will utilize civil suits to root out their conduct and recover their ill-gotten gains.”
FLORIDA
Second Government FCA Settlement Brings Total Government Recoveries to $217.5 Million
On April 3, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a second False Claims Act (FCA) settlement ' totaling $137.5 million ' with Tampa, FL-based Wellcare Health Plans Inc. (Wellcare), arising from the government's criminal and civil investigation of Wellcare that commenced in 2006. The government's earlier Wellcare settlement, in the form of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement that included restitution and forfeiture commitments totaling $80 million, was concluded on May 5, 2009.
Specifically, the settlement announced on April 3 resolves four whistleblower lawsuits filed pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the FCA. The qui tam suits alleged multiple schemes involving Medicare and Medicaid, including retention of overpayments and falsification of data. According to the government's release, Wellcare provides managed health care services for roughly 2.6 million beneficiaries of these programs across the country.
As part of the settlement, the four whistleblowers ' referred to as “relators” under the FCA ' received $25.41 million of the settlement, with over 80% of that total allocated to a former Wellcare financial analyst, as the analyst's lawsuit triggered the government's investigation. The remainder of the settlement will be split among the United States and nine separate states.
In announcing the settlement, Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Civil Division, made the following comments: “Government health plans increasingly rely on managed care organizations to provide patient care. This case illustrates our commitment to ensur[ing] that government funds are in fact used to render care and not to line the pockets of those more concerned with the bottom line.”
Additionally, Robert E. O'Neill, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, had the following to say about the settlement: “The monies recovered in restitution and from this settlement agreement will go to the federal and state programs which suffered these losses, while the forfeited funds will go to law enforcement to help fund future investigations,” adding that “[i]n an era of decreasing federal and state budgets, and increasing healthcare costs, we must pursue all available civil remedies to recover losses suffered by government healthcare programs. This settlement should serve as notice to those defrauding state and federal healthcare programs that, in addition to appropriate criminal prosecutions, we will utilize civil suits to root out their conduct and recover their ill-gotten gains.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.