Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
TEXAS
Orthofix Reaches Combined FCPA Settlement
On July 10, Orthofix International N.V. reached a settlement with the DOJ and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in connection with Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) investigations of the Texas-based orthopedic-products manufacturer. As part of the agreement, which is awaiting court approval, Orthofix agreed to enter into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ, a corresponding civil consent with the SEC, as well as payment of $7.4 million. The settlement resolves FCPA allegations from 2003 until 2010.
According to the Indictment, Orthofix's Mexican subsidiary, Promeca S.A. de C.V., bribed Mexican government officials in the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, a public healthcare and social services institution. In particular, the subsidiary referred to the bribes as “chocolates” in its communications. Rather than confections, the items provided were cash, laptop computers, televisions, and appliances. The value of the “chocolates” totaled around $317,000. Further, the Complaint alleged that the payments were falsely recorded on Orthofix's books as either cash advances or training and promotions expenses, violating Sections 13(b)(2)(A'B) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Of the $7.4 million payment, $5,225,701 is disgorgement and prejudgment interest, with the remaining $2,220,000 portion representing the fine. The settlement did not include appointment of an independent external monitor.
VIRGINIA
DS&S Agrees to $8.82 Million Criminal Penalty
The DOJ's Criminal Division filed a two-count Information on June 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia against Data Systems & Solutions LLC (DS&S or the Company) for conspiring to violate and violating the FCPA. The charges against DS&S, which provides services for nuclear and fossil fuel power plants, including design, installation and maintenance, stemmed from contracts with Ignalia Nuclear Power Plant, a state-owned power plant in Lithuania. To resolve the charges, the Company agreed to pay an $8.82 million penalty and enter into a two-year deferred prosecution agreement.
According to the government, DS&S offered and paid bribes to the Director General of Ignalia and at least four other officials through several methods, including the funding of trips to Florida and Hawaii, above-market payments to a subcontractor owned by a senior Ignalia official, and payments for subcontractor modifications that were never to be performed. In exchange, DS&S received multiple contracts between 1999 and 2004, with a total value exceeding $35 million. The officials influenced the award of contracts by recommending DS&S, providing DS&S with inside information about the contracts and competitors, and by tailoring project designs for DS&S.
The DOJ noted DS&S's “extraordinary” cooperation; specifically, that the Company conducted an “extensive, thorough and swift” internal investigation, provided substantial evidence and information, terminated the responsible employees, and improved company polices and training programs to ensure greater compliance and detection in the future.
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Summer Associate Christian Ascunce.
TEXAS
Orthofix Reaches Combined FCPA Settlement
On July 10, Orthofix International N.V. reached a settlement with the DOJ and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), in connection with Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) investigations of the Texas-based orthopedic-products manufacturer. As part of the agreement, which is awaiting court approval, Orthofix agreed to enter into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ, a corresponding civil consent with the SEC, as well as payment of $7.4 million. The settlement resolves FCPA allegations from 2003 until 2010.
According to the Indictment, Orthofix's Mexican subsidiary, Promeca S.A. de C.V., bribed Mexican government officials in the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, a public healthcare and social services institution. In particular, the subsidiary referred to the bribes as “chocolates” in its communications. Rather than confections, the items provided were cash, laptop computers, televisions, and appliances. The value of the “chocolates” totaled around $317,000. Further, the Complaint alleged that the payments were falsely recorded on Orthofix's books as either cash advances or training and promotions expenses, violating Sections 13(b)(2)(A'B) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Of the $7.4 million payment, $5,225,701 is disgorgement and prejudgment interest, with the remaining $2,220,000 portion representing the fine. The settlement did not include appointment of an independent external monitor.
DS&S Agrees to $8.82 Million Criminal Penalty
The DOJ's Criminal Division filed a two-count Information on June 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
According to the government, DS&S offered and paid bribes to the Director General of Ignalia and at least four other officials through several methods, including the funding of trips to Florida and Hawaii, above-market payments to a subcontractor owned by a senior Ignalia official, and payments for subcontractor modifications that were never to be performed. In exchange, DS&S received multiple contracts between 1999 and 2004, with a total value exceeding $35 million. The officials influenced the award of contracts by recommending DS&S, providing DS&S with inside information about the contracts and competitors, and by tailoring project designs for DS&S.
The DOJ noted DS&S's “extraordinary” cooperation; specifically, that the Company conducted an “extensive, thorough and swift” internal investigation, provided substantial evidence and information, terminated the responsible employees, and improved company polices and training programs to ensure greater compliance and detection in the future.
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.