Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<i><b>Online Extra</i></b> NLRB Memo 'Unlikes' Social Media Policies

By Sue Reisinger
July 26, 2013

In a warning to employers, the National Labor Relations Board has 'unliked' certain social media policies that restrict an employee's right to speak critically of the employer online, unless the policies were set in collective bargaining.

In a recently released'advice memo [PDF], the agency says social media policies are work rules that provide a basis for discipline, and as such must be the subject of bargaining unless a union waives that right.

The memo was written by the NLRB's Office of General Counsel and was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by'Law360. It involves the Giant Food company and its three unions.

'The memo also reemphasized prior GC social media pronouncements to find that certain provisions of Giant Food's policy'commonly found within employee handbooks'infringed on its employees' National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) rights,' according to Joel Barras, labor and employment counsel at Reed Smith in Philadelphia, writing on the firm's'Employment Law Watch blog.

The employer's policy, according to the memo, contained at least three guidelines that prohibited releasing confidential company information, using the company logo or other visual elements, or discrediting the company's products. Another guideline told employees to speak up if someone was violating the guidelines or 'misusing' a company website.

The Office of General Counsel found some of this language too vague and overreaching, because an employee could read it to prohibit sharing information on wages or work conditions.

The NLRA protects the rights of employees to speak and to act together to address work conditions. Since 2010, the NLRB has'extended this protection to work-related conversations on social media'like Facebook and Twitter, and the Office of General Counsel has issued complaints against employers who issue policies that overly restrict employees' conversations on social media.

The Giant Food memo concludes that 'portions of the employer's social media policy violate [the NLRA] because they would reasonably be construed to chill' protected employee activity under the Act.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote next week to confirm President Barack Obama's two nominees to the NLRB. Nancy Schiffer, former associate general counsel to the AFL-CIO, and Kent Hirozawa, chief counsel to the NLRB's chairman, were nominated last week as part of a compromise with Republicans on the confirmation process.

The two'testified at a Senate hearing'on Tuesday and vowed to be impartial members of the board.


Sue Reisinger writes for Corportae Counsel, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

In a warning to employers, the National Labor Relations Board has 'unliked' certain social media policies that restrict an employee's right to speak critically of the employer online, unless the policies were set in collective bargaining.

In a recently released'advice memo [PDF], the agency says social media policies are work rules that provide a basis for discipline, and as such must be the subject of bargaining unless a union waives that right.

The memo was written by the NLRB's Office of General Counsel and was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by'Law360. It involves the Giant Food company and its three unions.

'The memo also reemphasized prior GC social media pronouncements to find that certain provisions of Giant Food's policy'commonly found within employee handbooks'infringed on its employees' National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) rights,' according to Joel Barras, labor and employment counsel at Reed Smith in Philadelphia, writing on the firm's'Employment Law Watch blog.

The employer's policy, according to the memo, contained at least three guidelines that prohibited releasing confidential company information, using the company logo or other visual elements, or discrediting the company's products. Another guideline told employees to speak up if someone was violating the guidelines or 'misusing' a company website.

The Office of General Counsel found some of this language too vague and overreaching, because an employee could read it to prohibit sharing information on wages or work conditions.

The NLRA protects the rights of employees to speak and to act together to address work conditions. Since 2010, the NLRB has'extended this protection to work-related conversations on social media'like Facebook and Twitter, and the Office of General Counsel has issued complaints against employers who issue policies that overly restrict employees' conversations on social media.

The Giant Food memo concludes that 'portions of the employer's social media policy violate [the NLRA] because they would reasonably be construed to chill' protected employee activity under the Act.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote next week to confirm President Barack Obama's two nominees to the NLRB. Nancy Schiffer, former associate general counsel to the AFL-CIO, and Kent Hirozawa, chief counsel to the NLRB's chairman, were nominated last week as part of a compromise with Republicans on the confirmation process.

The two'testified at a Senate hearing'on Tuesday and vowed to be impartial members of the board.


Sue Reisinger writes for Corportae Counsel, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.