Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

At the Intersection: Searching for Clients with Bottomless Wallets

By Pamela Woldow
August 27, 2013

It happens often in Legal Project Management (LPM) workshops when talk turns to how aggressively clients are pressing to control legal fees. Some partner leans back in his chair and proclaims that LPM simply does not apply to his work because his clients don't care how much is spent on legal fees. This stunning revelation occurs in almost every practice group, every jurisdiction, and every firm: “I don't need this stuff, because my clients are not fee-sensitive.”

These partners are not referring to “bet the company” matters where the stakes or the risks justify top-dollar fee structures. We all know that in such unprecedented situations, companies focused on saving the ship (or avoiding spending time behind bars) will pay steep legal tariffs.

No, these partners are talking about pricing far more routine matters, and they talk as if these deep-pocketed clients of theirs ' if they in fact exist at all ' somehow represent the current norm rather than wishful historical artifacts.

Reality or Wishful Thinking?

Let's be clear: A far more accurate generalization is that these days the vast majority of clients ' okay, all of 'em ' are ruled by their budgets and have laser-like
focus on reducing legal costs, squeezing maximum value from their legal representation, and holding to well-defined budgets. The assertion that there are clients who have so much available cash to burn on legal fees or are so unconcerned with legal costs that they blithely write checks for whatever amount the legal invoice requests represents either fiction, fantasy, or a striking exception to prevailing legal trends. Either that, or it represents evidence that certain law firm partners are out of touch with their clients' needs and priorities.

If this claim that their clients don't care about rates and fees had been trotted out only a few times, it would be easy to subscribe to the out-of-touch explanation. But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Because lawyers are generally not given to delusional thinking, I've decided to give credence to their declarations and ' rather like Diogenes and his lamp ' conduct a search for clients with bottomless wallets. Here goes:

Calling All Clients '

Hello, hello! If you are a legal client who simply pays legal bills without review, who does not care about the numbers on the invoice, and who has a bottomless wallet, please contact me. I can make you the most popular person in North America. I can get you a lot more than 15 minutes of fame! There is a great deal of interest in your attitude by every one of the 1,225,452 licensed attorneys in the United States. They want to meet and court you. They are willing to provide “hang the expense” lawyering in which efficiency plays second fiddle to their sheer legal brilliance. There is no doubt that I can line up feature interviews for you with the WSJ, NYT, CNN, and every other news outlet, because you are such a rara avis ' a rare bird. Don't be shy. Like unicorns, the Loch Ness monster, and Sasquatch, we know that you are out there somewhere. Let's have a look at you!


Editorial Board member Pamela Woldow is a Certified Master Coach with experience in individual lawyer coaching and in designing law department leadership development programs. Reach her at [email protected].

'

'

It happens often in Legal Project Management (LPM) workshops when talk turns to how aggressively clients are pressing to control legal fees. Some partner leans back in his chair and proclaims that LPM simply does not apply to his work because his clients don't care how much is spent on legal fees. This stunning revelation occurs in almost every practice group, every jurisdiction, and every firm: “I don't need this stuff, because my clients are not fee-sensitive.”

These partners are not referring to “bet the company” matters where the stakes or the risks justify top-dollar fee structures. We all know that in such unprecedented situations, companies focused on saving the ship (or avoiding spending time behind bars) will pay steep legal tariffs.

No, these partners are talking about pricing far more routine matters, and they talk as if these deep-pocketed clients of theirs ' if they in fact exist at all ' somehow represent the current norm rather than wishful historical artifacts.

Reality or Wishful Thinking?

Let's be clear: A far more accurate generalization is that these days the vast majority of clients ' okay, all of 'em ' are ruled by their budgets and have laser-like
focus on reducing legal costs, squeezing maximum value from their legal representation, and holding to well-defined budgets. The assertion that there are clients who have so much available cash to burn on legal fees or are so unconcerned with legal costs that they blithely write checks for whatever amount the legal invoice requests represents either fiction, fantasy, or a striking exception to prevailing legal trends. Either that, or it represents evidence that certain law firm partners are out of touch with their clients' needs and priorities.

If this claim that their clients don't care about rates and fees had been trotted out only a few times, it would be easy to subscribe to the out-of-touch explanation. But hey, maybe I'm wrong. Because lawyers are generally not given to delusional thinking, I've decided to give credence to their declarations and ' rather like Diogenes and his lamp ' conduct a search for clients with bottomless wallets. Here goes:

Calling All Clients '

Hello, hello! If you are a legal client who simply pays legal bills without review, who does not care about the numbers on the invoice, and who has a bottomless wallet, please contact me. I can make you the most popular person in North America. I can get you a lot more than 15 minutes of fame! There is a great deal of interest in your attitude by every one of the 1,225,452 licensed attorneys in the United States. They want to meet and court you. They are willing to provide “hang the expense” lawyering in which efficiency plays second fiddle to their sheer legal brilliance. There is no doubt that I can line up feature interviews for you with the WSJ, NYT, CNN, and every other news outlet, because you are such a rara avis ' a rare bird. Don't be shy. Like unicorns, the Loch Ness monster, and Sasquatch, we know that you are out there somewhere. Let's have a look at you!


Editorial Board member Pamela Woldow is a Certified Master Coach with experience in individual lawyer coaching and in designing law department leadership development programs. Reach her at [email protected].

'

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.