Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
TEXAS
SEC Gets Emergency Asset Freeze in Forex Trading Scheme
On July 12, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced an emergency asset freeze against Kevin G. White, an unregistered money manager accused of defrauding investors in a foreign currency exchange (FOREX) trading scheme. The U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas granted the SEC's request, as well as a temporary restraining order against White and his companies.
White is alleged to have made numerous misrepresentations to investors, including falsely describing his credentials and background, failing to disclose disciplinary history to investors, and failing to register securities with the SEC, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). White was not currently registered or associated with the New York Stock Exchange or any member organization at the time of the SEC's complaint.
White is accused of using investor misrepresentations to solicit nearly $7.1 million for a FOREX trading fund. The crux of these misrepresentations included statements that the fund's compound annual growth rate was more than 36%, with total fund returns of more than 393%. The SEC claimed that ' in actuality ' the fund had realized substantial losses and was currently valued at approximately $3 million. The SEC also contended that White has misappropriated $1.7 million of fund investments to pay for personal and unrelated business expenses, an amount in excess of the cumulative management fees he collected from investors. Director of the SEC's Forth Worth, TX, Regional Office, David Woodcock, stated that “White and his companies brandished phony credentials and a can't-miss trading strategy to lure investors into a web of deceit.” The CFTC is also pursuing parallel charges.
WASHINGTON, DC
Panasonic and Subsidiary SANYO Settle Price-Fixing Disputes
On July 18, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Japanese-based Panasonic Corp. and its subsidiary, SANYO Electric Co. Ltd., agreed to plead guilty and pay a combined $56.5 million in fines for their roles in separate price-fixing conspiracies.
Panasonic plead guilty to three counts of conspiracy to restrain trade under section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. ' 1). The charges stemmed from Panasonic's involvement ' as early as July 1998 and continuing through at least February 2010 ' in bid rigging and price-fixing of various vehicle switches, steering angle sensors, and automotive high-intensity discharge ballasts that were sold to major car manufacturers, including Toyota and Honda. As a result of Panasonic's and other co-conspirator's agreements to suppress and eliminate competition, the parts were sold to consumers at higher prices.
SANYO also plead guilty to one felony count of conspiracy for its agreement to fix the prices of cylindrical lithium ion battery cells used in notebook computer battery packs. Panasonic and Sanyo have also agreed to cooperate in DOJ's ongoing investigations. As of Panasonic's (and Sanyo's) plea date, 11 companies and 15 executives have pled or have agreed to plead guilty in connection with the DOJ's investigation, which has netted more than $874 million in criminal fines. The agreements are subject to approval by the District Court.
'
'
'
'
TEXAS
SEC Gets Emergency Asset Freeze in Forex Trading Scheme
On July 12, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced an emergency asset freeze against Kevin G. White, an unregistered money manager accused of defrauding investors in a foreign currency exchange (FOREX) trading scheme. The U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas granted the SEC's request, as well as a temporary restraining order against White and his companies.
White is alleged to have made numerous misrepresentations to investors, including falsely describing his credentials and background, failing to disclose disciplinary history to investors, and failing to register securities with the SEC, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). White was not currently registered or associated with the
White is accused of using investor misrepresentations to solicit nearly $7.1 million for a FOREX trading fund. The crux of these misrepresentations included statements that the fund's compound annual growth rate was more than 36%, with total fund returns of more than 393%. The SEC claimed that ' in actuality ' the fund had realized substantial losses and was currently valued at approximately $3 million. The SEC also contended that White has misappropriated $1.7 million of fund investments to pay for personal and unrelated business expenses, an amount in excess of the cumulative management fees he collected from investors. Director of the SEC's Forth Worth, TX, Regional Office, David Woodcock, stated that “White and his companies brandished phony credentials and a can't-miss trading strategy to lure investors into a web of deceit.” The CFTC is also pursuing parallel charges.
WASHINGTON, DC
Panasonic and Subsidiary SANYO Settle Price-Fixing Disputes
On July 18, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Japanese-based Panasonic Corp. and its subsidiary, SANYO Electric Co. Ltd., agreed to plead guilty and pay a combined $56.5 million in fines for their roles in separate price-fixing conspiracies.
Panasonic plead guilty to three counts of conspiracy to restrain trade under section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. ' 1). The charges stemmed from Panasonic's involvement ' as early as July 1998 and continuing through at least February 2010 ' in bid rigging and price-fixing of various vehicle switches, steering angle sensors, and automotive high-intensity discharge ballasts that were sold to major car manufacturers, including Toyota and Honda. As a result of Panasonic's and other co-conspirator's agreements to suppress and eliminate competition, the parts were sold to consumers at higher prices.
SANYO also plead guilty to one felony count of conspiracy for its agreement to fix the prices of cylindrical lithium ion battery cells used in notebook computer battery packs. Panasonic and Sanyo have also agreed to cooperate in DOJ's ongoing investigations. As of Panasonic's (and Sanyo's) plea date, 11 companies and 15 executives have pled or have agreed to plead guilty in connection with the DOJ's investigation, which has netted more than $874 million in criminal fines. The agreements are subject to approval by the District Court.
'
'
'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.