Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Financier Got Bona Fide Right To Screenplay Copyright

By Stan Soocher
January 31, 2014

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that an investor obtained the copyright to a film screenplay, even if the finance advisor for the production company in which the screenplay author had an equity interest fraudulently induced the author to assign the copyright to the production company. McDonald v. Brown, 12 Civ. 7109.

Christian McDonald wrote the screenplay Remnants and co-formed Res Ipsa Loquitur Productions to produce an independent film. Barry Jay Weiss was hired to arrange the film financing. Res Ipsa then joined with Cine Globe Productions to form Remnant Productions LLC. Meanwhile, McDonald assigned his screenplay copyright to Res Ipsa, then to Remnant Productions. McDonald claimed Reiss promised that the author would serve as the film's director and retain the screenplay copyright until his film directing and writing services were fulfilled. Thomas V. Conigliaro was among those who provided the financing for the Remnants film project.

However, a different director was hired to complete the movie. In addition, a dispute arose between Conigliaro and the Remnant parties. Conigliaro filed suit (though not against McDonald) alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary obligation. That case was settled in 2011 with the assets of Remnant Productions, including the screenplay copyright, transferred to Conigliaro. McDonald later filed his own suit, including against Barry Jay Reiss (though McDonald and Reiss settled) and for copyright infringement, including against Conigliaro.

Granting summary judgment for the Conigliaro defendants, District Judge William H. Pauley III noted: 'McDonald has presented no evidence that Conigliaro or his attorney had notice of Reiss['s] ' purported fraudulent promises that McDonald would serve as director and retain the screenplay copyright. Because Conigliaro knew only of McDonald's compensation under the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement ', no reasonable jury could find that Conigliaro was on notice of Reiss's purported fraud.'

But McDonald argued the 2011 Conigliaro/Remnant parties' settlement voided his earlier copyright assignment for which he argued he had now received no legal 'consideration.' District Judge Pauley found, however, that 'when McDonald's business partner executed the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement, McDonald's partnership received a 49.5% ownership interest in a production company with the capacity to turn McDonald's screenplay into a film that could be distributed commercially. That represents valid consideration.'


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that an investor obtained the copyright to a film screenplay, even if the finance advisor for the production company in which the screenplay author had an equity interest fraudulently induced the author to assign the copyright to the production company. McDonald v. Brown, 12 Civ. 7109.

Christian McDonald wrote the screenplay Remnants and co-formed Res Ipsa Loquitur Productions to produce an independent film. Barry Jay Weiss was hired to arrange the film financing. Res Ipsa then joined with Cine Globe Productions to form Remnant Productions LLC. Meanwhile, McDonald assigned his screenplay copyright to Res Ipsa, then to Remnant Productions. McDonald claimed Reiss promised that the author would serve as the film's director and retain the screenplay copyright until his film directing and writing services were fulfilled. Thomas V. Conigliaro was among those who provided the financing for the Remnants film project.

However, a different director was hired to complete the movie. In addition, a dispute arose between Conigliaro and the Remnant parties. Conigliaro filed suit (though not against McDonald) alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary obligation. That case was settled in 2011 with the assets of Remnant Productions, including the screenplay copyright, transferred to Conigliaro. McDonald later filed his own suit, including against Barry Jay Reiss (though McDonald and Reiss settled) and for copyright infringement, including against Conigliaro.

Granting summary judgment for the Conigliaro defendants, District Judge William H. Pauley III noted: 'McDonald has presented no evidence that Conigliaro or his attorney had notice of Reiss['s] ' purported fraudulent promises that McDonald would serve as director and retain the screenplay copyright. Because Conigliaro knew only of McDonald's compensation under the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement ', no reasonable jury could find that Conigliaro was on notice of Reiss's purported fraud.'

But McDonald argued the 2011 Conigliaro/Remnant parties' settlement voided his earlier copyright assignment for which he argued he had now received no legal 'consideration.' District Judge Pauley found, however, that 'when McDonald's business partner executed the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement, McDonald's partnership received a 49.5% ownership interest in a production company with the capacity to turn McDonald's screenplay into a film that could be distributed commercially. That represents valid consideration.'


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Cost of Making Partner Image

Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.