Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that an investor obtained the copyright to a film screenplay, even if the finance advisor for the production company in which the screenplay author had an equity interest fraudulently induced the author to assign the copyright to the production company. McDonald v. Brown, 12 Civ. 7109.
Christian McDonald wrote the screenplay Remnants and co-formed Res Ipsa Loquitur Productions to produce an independent film. Barry Jay Weiss was hired to arrange the film financing. Res Ipsa then joined with Cine Globe Productions to form Remnant Productions LLC. Meanwhile, McDonald assigned his screenplay copyright to Res Ipsa, then to Remnant Productions. McDonald claimed Reiss promised that the author would serve as the film's director and retain the screenplay copyright until his film directing and writing services were fulfilled. Thomas V. Conigliaro was among those who provided the financing for the Remnants film project.
However, a different director was hired to complete the movie. In addition, a dispute arose between Conigliaro and the Remnant parties. Conigliaro filed suit (though not against McDonald) alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary obligation. That case was settled in 2011 with the assets of Remnant Productions, including the screenplay copyright, transferred to Conigliaro. McDonald later filed his own suit, including against Barry Jay Reiss (though McDonald and Reiss settled) and for copyright infringement, including against Conigliaro.
Granting summary judgment for the Conigliaro defendants, District Judge William H. Pauley III noted: 'McDonald has presented no evidence that Conigliaro or his attorney had notice of Reiss['s] ' purported fraudulent promises that McDonald would serve as director and retain the screenplay copyright. Because Conigliaro knew only of McDonald's compensation under the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement ', no reasonable jury could find that Conigliaro was on notice of Reiss's purported fraud.'
But McDonald argued the 2011 Conigliaro/Remnant parties' settlement voided his earlier copyright assignment for which he argued he had now received no legal 'consideration.' District Judge Pauley found, however, that 'when McDonald's business partner executed the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement, McDonald's partnership received a 49.5% ownership interest in a production company with the capacity to turn McDonald's screenplay into a film that could be distributed commercially. That represents valid consideration.'
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Christian McDonald wrote the screenplay Remnants and co-formed Res Ipsa Loquitur Productions to produce an independent film. Barry Jay Weiss was hired to arrange the film financing. Res Ipsa then joined with Cine Globe Productions to form Remnant Productions LLC. Meanwhile, McDonald assigned his screenplay copyright to Res Ipsa, then to Remnant Productions. McDonald claimed Reiss promised that the author would serve as the film's director and retain the screenplay copyright until his film directing and writing services were fulfilled. Thomas V. Conigliaro was among those who provided the financing for the Remnants film project.
However, a different director was hired to complete the movie. In addition, a dispute arose between Conigliaro and the Remnant parties. Conigliaro filed suit (though not against McDonald) alleging misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary obligation. That case was settled in 2011 with the assets of Remnant Productions, including the screenplay copyright, transferred to Conigliaro. McDonald later filed his own suit, including against Barry Jay Reiss (though McDonald and Reiss settled) and for copyright infringement, including against Conigliaro.
Granting summary judgment for the Conigliaro defendants, District Judge
But McDonald argued the 2011 Conigliaro/Remnant parties' settlement voided his earlier copyright assignment for which he argued he had now received no legal 'consideration.' District Judge Pauley found, however, that 'when McDonald's business partner executed the [Remnant Productions] operating agreement, McDonald's partnership received a 49.5% ownership interest in a production company with the capacity to turn McDonald's screenplay into a film that could be distributed commercially. That represents valid consideration.'
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.