Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A federal appellate court ruled last month that self-service movie kiosk company Redbox did not violate the Video Privacy Protection Act by giving an outside customer-service vendor access to its customer database.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed Northern District of Illinois Judge Matthew Kennelly's August 2013 summary judgment for the company.
In'Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail LLC, Kennelly wrote that the information sharing fell within an exception to the law that allows such disclosures in the ordinary course of business.
The Seventh Circuit agreed in a ruling by Judge Joel Flaum. 'If it is permissible to disclose [personally identifiable information] to Stream in order to respond to a customer's call, there is nothing objectionable about Redbox's wholesale disclosure of information pertaining to all customers, for use in the event of such a call,' he wrote. Judges Michael Kanne and Daniel Manion joined the opinion.
The ruling also approved disclosure of customer information in Stream's training programs.
Redbox user Kevin Sterk's original complaint, filed in March 2011, alleged that Redbox violated the act by unlawfully retaining customer information. His amended lawsuit, joined by Jiah Chung, added the unlawful-disclosure claim.
The Seventh Circuit ruled in 2012 that the law does not provide for monetary damages'for an unlawful retention claim.
Neither Redbox nor Dentons Chicago partner Natalie Spears, who argued for the company on appeal, responded to requests for comment.
Roger Perlstadt, a Chicago associate at Edelson who argued the plaintiffs' Seventh Circuit case, did not respond.
Thursday's ruling echoed recent district court decisions. U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash Jr. of Georgia this month dismissed a similar purported class action,'Ellis v. The Cartoon Network Inc.
In June, U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler declined to certify a class allegedly harmed by video privacy act violations in'In re: Hulu Privacy Litigation.'In an April summary judgment, Beeler said Hulu was not liable for sharing user information with data analytics firm comScore Inc., but was liable for sharing it with Facebook Inc.
Sheri Qualters writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].
'
'
A federal appellate court ruled last month that self-service movie kiosk company Redbox did not violate the Video Privacy Protection Act by giving an outside customer-service vendor access to its customer database.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed Northern District of Illinois Judge Matthew Kennelly's August 2013 summary judgment for the company.
In'Sterk v.
The Seventh Circuit agreed in a ruling by Judge Joel Flaum. 'If it is permissible to disclose [personally identifiable information] to Stream in order to respond to a customer's call, there is nothing objectionable about Redbox's wholesale disclosure of information pertaining to all customers, for use in the event of such a call,' he wrote. Judges Michael Kanne and Daniel Manion joined the opinion.
The ruling also approved disclosure of customer information in Stream's training programs.
Redbox user Kevin Sterk's original complaint, filed in March 2011, alleged that Redbox violated the act by unlawfully retaining customer information. His amended lawsuit, joined by Jiah Chung, added the unlawful-disclosure claim.
The Seventh Circuit ruled in 2012 that the law does not provide for monetary damages'for an unlawful retention claim.
Neither Redbox nor
Roger Perlstadt, a Chicago associate at Edelson who argued the plaintiffs' Seventh Circuit case, did not respond.
Thursday's ruling echoed recent district court decisions. U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash Jr. of Georgia this month dismissed a similar purported class action,'Ellis v. The Cartoon Network Inc.
In June, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Sheri Qualters writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM sibling of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].
'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.