Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Johns Hopkins Settles Gynecologist Filming Case
Johns Hopkins Health System of Baltimore has agreed to pay $190 million to settle a class action suit brought by thousands of women who were secretly photographed and/or filmed during exams by gynecologist Dr. Nikita Levy. The doctor, who had worked at Johns Hopkins for 25 years, used a pen-like camera hanging from a cord around his neck to surreptitiously record the women's exams, then later stored these recordings on his home computer. Dr. Levy committed suicide shortly after his actions came to light. Although none of the women are identified in the recordings, and their faces are not visible, plaintiff attorneys contended ' and Johns Hopkins agreed ' that they were traumatized by the revelation that their privacy had been violated by a trusted medical professional. In a statement issued July 21, Johns Hopkins Medicine said, “We have come to an agreement that the plaintiffs' attorneys and Johns Hopkins Health System believe is fair and properly balances the concerns of thousands of plaintiffs with obligations the Health System has to provide ongoing and superior care to the community. It is our hope that this settlement ' and findings by law enforcement that images were not shared ' helps those affected achieve a measure of closure.” See bit.ly/1xp1naR.
'
'
Johns Hopkins Settles Gynecologist Filming Case
Johns Hopkins Health System of Baltimore has agreed to pay $190 million to settle a class action suit brought by thousands of women who were secretly photographed and/or filmed during exams by gynecologist Dr. Nikita Levy. The doctor, who had worked at Johns Hopkins for 25 years, used a pen-like camera hanging from a cord around his neck to surreptitiously record the women's exams, then later stored these recordings on his home computer. Dr. Levy committed suicide shortly after his actions came to light. Although none of the women are identified in the recordings, and their faces are not visible, plaintiff attorneys contended ' and Johns Hopkins agreed ' that they were traumatized by the revelation that their privacy had been violated by a trusted medical professional. In a statement issued July 21, Johns Hopkins Medicine said, “We have come to an agreement that the plaintiffs' attorneys and Johns Hopkins Health System believe is fair and properly balances the concerns of thousands of plaintiffs with obligations the Health System has to provide ongoing and superior care to the community. It is our hope that this settlement ' and findings by law enforcement that images were not shared ' helps those affected achieve a measure of closure.” See bit.ly/1xp1naR.
'
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.