Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Website Slanders Doctor and Must Come Down
A New York state judge has issued a preliminary injunction to stop the operation of a website set up by medical malpractice plaintiff Arye Sachs, because it slandered a doctor by comparing him to Nazi doctor Joseph Mengele. The latter was a doctor at Germany's Auschwitz concentration camp during the Second World War; he was the most notorious of the team of doctors that decided which prisoners should work, which should be subjected to medical experiments; and which should be killed in the gas chambers. Justice Arthur Diamond found that the medical malpractice plaintiff's website's comparison between Mengele and Dr. Richard Matano was not a “protected qualified privilege.” The judge deemed the man's statements “bald” and “reckless” and concluded they were made “in disregard of the truth.”
First Murder Conviction Against a U.S. Doctor for Overprescription of Drugs
In October, a doctor in Roland Heights, CA, was convicted of three murders stemming from her over-prescription of a slew of dangerous drugs to patients who had no legitimate need for them. According to the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, which prosecuted the case against Dr. Hsiu Ying “Lisa” Tseng, the verdict is the first instance in the country in which a doctor has been found guilty of the crime of murder for overprescribing medications. The three young men who died were among the many patients to whom the convicted doctor prescribed medications, often without keeping records of their care.
'
Website Slanders Doctor and Must Come Down
A
First Murder Conviction Against a U.S. Doctor for Overprescription of Drugs
In October, a doctor in Roland Heights, CA, was convicted of three murders stemming from her over-prescription of a slew of dangerous drugs to patients who had no legitimate need for them. According to the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office, which prosecuted the case against Dr. Hsiu Ying “Lisa” Tseng, the verdict is the first instance in the country in which a doctor has been found guilty of the crime of murder for overprescribing medications. The three young men who died were among the many patients to whom the convicted doctor prescribed medications, often without keeping records of their care.
'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.