Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How the U.S.-China Trade War Effects IP Strategy

By Rob Maier
November 01, 2019

The trade war between the United States and China has had far-reaching effects on international trade and the global economy. The dispute is slowly developing into a battle of attrition, without any immediate resolution on the horizon despite ongoing trade talks. As businesses change the way they operate in response to this unpredictable trade environment, counsel should consider the risks and potential impacts on corporate IP strategy.

Background

The trade dispute is the culmination of long-standing tensions between the United States and China. For decades, the United States has maintained a trade deficit with China, and that deficit has increased dramatically in recent years — from less than $100 million in the late 1990s, the excess of U.S. imports from China over exports to China topped $419 billion in 2018. See, "The People's Republic of China: U.S.-China Trade Facts," Office of the United States Trade Representative. This trade imbalance has resulted in the wide availability of inexpensive imported goods for the American public, but at the expense of manufacturing jobs in the United States.

In addition to the widening trade deficit, another driver of the trade war has been China's history of intellectual property misappropriation. While the United States alleges illicit activities including theft by Chinese agents, e.g., by breaking into U.S. corporate offices, and bribing U.S. corporate employees, to obtain high-value trade secrets, the allegations of misappropriation extend to subtler activities. Foreign companies doing business in China have complained of China's use of administrative measures, such as foreign ownership restrictions, licensing requirements, and product approvals, as mechanisms used to coerce foreign companies to transfer technology and IP to Chinese companies. Although foreign ownership requirements have been relaxed in some sectors, in others foreign businesses are still required to form joint ventures with Chinese firms in order to do business in China. These joint ventures often require some level of technology transfer, after which the Chinese partner has sometimes used the transferred technology to thereafter compete with the foreign company.

This battle between the world's two largest economies has resulted in increased uncertainty in the global business environment. Many companies are delaying new investments in capital equipment, research and development, and IP procurement. In light of the unpredictability of global economic conditions, trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing, and the upcoming 2020 U.S. presidential election, there is no telling how long the uncertainty will last. The tariffs will continue to have meaningful impacts on many companies — including how and where they source materials, how and where they manufacture, and how their products are sold. In the midst of this unpredictability, and in light of the way that businesses are changing in response to the trade war, there are a number of things that companies based outside of China can do to reconsider their corporate IP strategies.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.