Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Structuring Strategies for Off-Balance-Sheet Treatment of Real Property Leases

By Jun Kwon
November 01, 2019

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a new set of lease accounting standards, known as Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842, which went into effect earlier this year. Most significantly, publicly traded companies are now obligated to list all leases of 12 months or longer on their balance sheets as both assets and liabilities. Large private companies will follow suit in 2020.

Traditionally, such leases have been condensed into the footnotes of company's accounting disclosures as off-balance-sheet operating expenses. Altering the categorization of such leases as debt rather than operating expenses will result in trillions of dollars to be transferred onto company books and, consequently, significant increases in company leverage, a key measure when evaluating a company's risk.

Under the new standards, companies are required to record all "leases" (except those with terms of less than one year) on their balance sheets as a right-of-use (ROU) asset and a lease liability. Whether a contract is a lease rests on two issues: whether the contract depends on the use of an "identified asset" and whether the contract conveys the "right to control the use of the identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration." FASB, ASC 842-10-15-3. If either element is missing, the contract is not a "lease" for financial accounting purposes. If a contract is not deemed to be or contain a lease, such contract will be deemed off-balance-sheet. Therefore, determining whether a contract is a lease under the new standards demands closer analysis.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.