Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Savo v. City of New York, 2022 WL 4489340, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landowners' action to recover damages for inverse condemnation, the city appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the action was time-barred.
Landowners own three nonadjacent parcels in Staten Island's Long Pond Park Preserve. By 1954, the city had acquired all of the lots which surround two of the three parcels now owned by landowners. Landowners purchased their property in 1994. In 2006, the city began acquiring all of the properties within the Preserve. In that year, the city's department of parks and recreation informed landowner of a determination approving the department's acquisition of their parcels. Ten years later, landowners' lawyer inquired about the status of the acquisition and was told that the properties were "on our list to be acquired." Three years later, in 2019, the lawyer again inquired and was told that the properties were on a list of potential acquisitions and that no funding was secured yet. Landowners then brought this action seeking damages for inverse condemnation. They contended that the city's failure to acquire the properties, while also failing to provide for ingress and egress, constituted a taking for public use. The city moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, but Supreme Court denied the motion. The city appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.