Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Savo v. City of New York, 2022 WL 4489340, AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In landowners' action to recover damages for inverse condemnation, the city appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its summary judgment motion. The Appellate Division reversed, holding that the action was time-barred.
Landowners own three nonadjacent parcels in Staten Island's Long Pond Park Preserve. By 1954, the city had acquired all of the lots which surround two of the three parcels now owned by landowners. Landowners purchased their property in 1994. In 2006, the city began acquiring all of the properties within the Preserve. In that year, the city's department of parks and recreation informed landowner of a determination approving the department's acquisition of their parcels. Ten years later, landowners' lawyer inquired about the status of the acquisition and was told that the properties were "on our list to be acquired." Three years later, in 2019, the lawyer again inquired and was told that the properties were on a list of potential acquisitions and that no funding was secured yet. Landowners then brought this action seeking damages for inverse condemnation. They contended that the city's failure to acquire the properties, while also failing to provide for ingress and egress, constituted a taking for public use. The city moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, but Supreme Court denied the motion. The city appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.