Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the typical commercial lease transaction, a guarantor promises to pay rent and fulfill other contractual obligations on behalf of the tenant (particularly when the tenant is a foreign actor or single-purpose entity with limited assets). If the tenant does not pay rent, the landlord's chief concern is to quickly regain possession of the space and relet it while simultaneously seeking to recover the unpaid rent directly from the (hopefully credit-worthy) guarantor.
In New York state and local court cases, there is a seldom-used procedural mechanism for obtaining an expedited money judgment against a guarantor. Specifically, a landlord may move for summary judgment in lieu of complaint under CPLR 3213 against the guarantor. If successful, and assuming that the tenant does not move the action to federal court based upon diversity jurisdiction or a federal question, the landlord will be able to bypass formal pleadings, discovery, and other motion practice (which require substantial time and expense) to obtain an accelerated money judgment.
This article provides: 1) an overview of CPLR 3213 motions; 2) an update on the resolution of the split that previously existed between the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First and Second Departments regarding CPLR 3213 motions; and 3) practical guidance for transactional counsel drafting commercial leases and guaranties as well as litigators considering whether to file a CPLR 3213 motion.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.