Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Friends of the Shawangunks v. Town of Gardiner Planning Board 2024 WL 367650, AppDiv, Third Dept. (Opinion by Garry, J.)
In an environmental group's article 78 proceeding challenging a grant of subdivision approval and a special use permit, the group appealed from Supreme Court's denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that while the group had standing, the planning board's construction of the town code was correct.
Landonwer sought a special use permit to build a new single-family home on part of his 108-acre parcel, which he proposed to subdivide into two lots, one of which would contain an existing residence. The parcel falls into three zoning subdistricts. In two of those subdistricts the code requires that permitted construction be at the lowest feasible elevation "on the property." The third subdistrict does not contain the restriction. Landowner's proposed new house would be located in the third subdistrict. The planning board granted subdivision approval and the special use permit, but the environmental group brought this proceeding contending that because the proposed construction was not on the lowest elevation on the property, the planning board had acted in violation of the town code. Supreme Court denied the petition.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.