The KPMG Tax Shelter Prosecutions
October 03, 2005
On Aug. 29, 2005, the Department of Justice, the IRS and KPMG LLP (KPMG) announced that an agreement had been reached with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York resolving the Grand Jury investigation into tax shelters designed, developed and sold by KPMG from 1996 to 2002 and related conduct. The settlement also resolved the IRS's examination of these activities. KPMG and the government entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), pursuant to which KPMG acknowledged responsibility for engaging in a massive tax fraud conspiracy that generated at least $11 billion in fraudulent tax losses, which cost the government at least $2.5 billion in evaded taxes.
Swinging for the Fences
August 30, 2005
On July 27, 2005, a Seattle federal judge sentenced the so-called "Millennium Bomber," who was convicted of conspiring to bomb Los Angeles International Airport during the 2000 New Year's holiday season (and who cooperated with the government for a period of time and then stopped), to 22 years in prison. The government had sought a 35-year sentence for the 38-year-old defendant.
The Rebirth of Advocacy
August 30, 2005
On Jan. 12, 2005, the Supreme Court in <i>United States v. Booker</i> ended months of speculation as to what was to become of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines after the Court's June 2004 decision in <i>Blakely v. Washington</i>, and held that the guidelines were unconstitutional. To remedy the unconstitutionality, the Court excised portions of the Sentencing Reform Act that required the sentencing judge to sentence within the guidelines range and that set the standard of appellate review of sentences.
Juror Dismissal During Deliberations
August 30, 2005
You've endured the roller coaster of a white-collar trial and hold out hope that protracted jury deliberations may presage an acquittal. But then the trial judge dismisses, for refusal to deliberate, a juror who may favor your client, installs an alternate and directs that deliberations begin anew. A guilty verdict and prison sentence ensue. It can happen; it did recently. In this age of protracted financial fraud and public corruption trials, it raises interesting cautionary issues for the white-collar defense lawyer.
In the Courts
July 28, 2005
Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
What to Do When an Audit Committee Complaint Arrives
July 28, 2005
Much attention has been paid to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the stock exchanges and Nasdaq that issuers establish procedures under which their audit committees can receive complaints, including anonymous complaints. Various service providers now offer issuers solutions in this area, including procedures to submit complaints through hotlines and e-mail addresses maintained by the service providers. But none of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the rules or the extensive commentary about establishing complaint procedures addresses what the audit committee is required to do with a complaint when one is received. This article briefly discusses some considerations in dealing with such a complaint.
