Law Firms Look At Closing Pay Systems
August 31, 2006
Unlike the vast majority of businesses in the United States, law firms generally operate under open systems that disclose the compensation of individual attorneys. The closed systems at Jones Day and Greenberg Traurig are major exceptions. But some observers say that law firms are moving toward closed systems as they function more like businesses and less like true partnerships.
Eight Steps for Boosting Associate and Lateral Retention
August 31, 2006
Attorney attrition is expensive. Replacing departing colleagues means not only recruiting and hiring strong candidates, but also investing in training for the new hires. Cost estimates for replacing an associate are typically between 100% and 200% of the associate's annual salary. The soft costs ' lost institutional knowledge and potential morale problems ' may be even greater. And attorneys who leave with bad feelings about the firm can spread their ill will in the local legal community, or try to lure others to follow. A mass exodus, of course, can cripple a firm.
Total Staff Training in Legal Ethics
August 31, 2006
Legal ethics training has traditionally focused on attorneys. Law school training and continuing legal education are staples of the professional development require-ments for lawyers. Ethical training must be widened, however, due to tremendous growth in the num-ber of law office support personnel, the complexity of practicing in a multi-jurisdictional environment, and the ever-changing use of technology. Failure to implement an office-wide ethics plan with training for all employees can have practical and financial repercussions for lawyers.
The Prudent Investor Rule
August 31, 2006
The Prudent Investor Rule sets forth the basic rules governing the conduct of fiduciaries in the management of trust assets. While the legal standards for investment fiduciaries can be traced as far back as an 1830 Massachusetts court case creating the redecessor 'Prudent Man' standard, the Prudent Investor Rule is of much more recent origin.
Supreme Court Denies Priority Status for Unpaid Workers' Compensation Premiums
August 31, 2006
In a recent decision, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified an issue important to workers' compensation insurers and held that pre-petition unpaid workers' compensation premiums are not entitled to priority status under the Bankruptcy Code. <i>Howard Delivery Service, Inc., et. al. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.</i>, 126 S. Ct. 2105 (2006). This decision forecloses any disagreement among the Circuit Courts that unpaid workers' compensation premiums are entitled to priority status in a bankruptcy proceeding. In light of <i>Howard</i>, such claims are now considered merely general unsecured claims. Had the Supreme Court afforded priority status to such claims, they would have been paid prior to the claims of general unsecured creditors. Generally, priority expense claims receive a significant, if not 100% distribution, as opposed to general unsecured claims, which, in many circumstances, receive only pennies on the dollar. In a decision delivered by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, joined by five other justices (Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. and Justices John Paul Stevens, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Stephen Breyer), the Supreme Court's ruling not only brings consistency to this issue, but also provides opportunities for workers' compensation insurers to avoid forfeiture of payment of their premiums by financially troubled insureds.
Product Liability Insurance: Can You Not Have It?
August 31, 2006
Today's economy depends heavily on the enormous range of products that are sold daily to consumers. Indeed, consumer demand for both the necessities and conveniences of life ' everything from lawn mowers and ovens to trampolines and espresso makers ' drives many manufacturers constantly to develop new products to sell. In today's litigious society, however, virtually every product sold represents at least the potential for product liability exposure. Jury awards and settlements frequently make headlines ' everyday household appliances, such as coffee makers, fryers, and blenders, have yielded damage awards or settlements as high as $2.25 million. Injuries from lawn mowers have generated awards or settlements as high as $2.6 million. Even furniture has the potential to yield awards or settlements in excess of a million dollars. Moreover, product liability exposure has ruined certain industries, <i>eg</i>, asbestos, and small companies without adequate insurance protection could face bankruptcy from a single product recall.
Employment Agreements and Severance
August 31, 2006
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code was enacted on Oct. 22, 2004 in an effort to regulate executive pay practices through the federal tax system. Failure to account for ' 409A's impact can seriously and adversely affect the economics of employment agreements, severance agreements, and other similar plans or other arrangements providing for a deferral of compensation. Consequently, this article details how ' 409A applies to these arrangements.
Records Management Goes 'C Suite'
August 31, 2006
Just 5 years ago, if you were to approach a C-suite executive about discussing his company's record-keeping policies and procedures, you likely would have been shown the door. After all, wasn't record-keeping, file storage and electronic data retrieval the purview of middle management; perhaps residing somewhere in facilities management, information technology, or human resources? Today, a few years and numerous perspective-changing developments later, a topic that once resided quietly in back offices and file rooms has emerged at the epicenter of high-level business conversations around internal controls and risk management. What happened?
Disposal of Computer Systems: Removal of Information
August 16, 2006
Your business is in the process of upgrading and replacing its computer assets and deciding what to do with the old servers, computers, and laptops. You might sell them, donate them to charity, or simply toss them in the garbage because they are 5 or more years old. Before you choose any disposal option, however, you should first consider what type of information may be stored on those old computer assets and then determine whether your business has a duty to protect that information as part of the disposal process.
