Revised Proposal: Understanding the Interagency Statement on Complex Structured Finance Activities
October 30, 2006
Many U.S. financial institutions that have participated in equipment leasing transactions (particularly in the large-ticket and municipal markets) in the last 20 years will be keenly aware that as the structures grew ever more complicated, Congress and the federal regulatory agencies grew intensely interested. Whether the institution had a major role in the transaction or simply provided a service, some degree of scrutiny could be expected, often in conjunction with a tax audit of its client. The risks to financial institutions from participating in complex structured finance transactions of all types became a source for concern for banking and securities regulators. The principal federal regulators responded in 2004 with a proposal that financial institutions investigate, and bear responsibility for evaluating, the legal, tax, and accounting basis of their clients' complex structured finance transactions. The goal: to limit the institutions' own credit, legal, and reputational risk from such participation.
The USA PATRIOT Act Renewed: Reassessing Money Laundering Risk in Finance Transactions
October 30, 2006
The federal government is stepping up its aggressive enforcement of anti-money laundering/combating the financing of terrorism ('AML/CFT'). Enforcement actions have already spread beyond 'traditional' financial institutions, such as banks. Regulations that are expected to be promulgated soon will likely embolden these enforcement actions against leasing companies, equipment vendors, finance companies, and other 'financial institutions.' These parties should reassess their compliance risk under the AML/CFT rules. The consequences of these risks are important. For example, the loss of reputation from being brushed with the taint of money laundering can sink a business.
In the Marketplace
September 29, 2006
Highlights of the latest equipment leasing news from around the country.
When Is Equipment Not 'Equipment'? Inventory Leasing or Leasing to Rental Companies
September 29, 2006
It is not unusual for a finance lessor to discover that its Lessee intends to enter into a contract with a third party whereby the Lessee delivers possession of the leased equipment to that third party. Although many finance lessors may be aware of the practical risks associated with having its leased property/collateral in the hands of a third party, many are unaware of the increased legal risks that result from such a situation. This article addresses some of the key issues. For the sake of clarity, the third party receiving possession and control of the leased equipment will be referred to as a 'Sublessee,' and the agreement between the Lessee and the Sublessee will be referred to as a 'Sublease.' It should be noted that a contract of service pursuant to which the Sublessee receives possession also constitutes a 'Sublease' for purposes of this article.
The Leasing Hotline
September 28, 2006
Highlights of the latest commercial leasing cases from around the country.
Looking at Lease Provisions from the Litigator's Angle
September 28, 2006
Frequently, commercial lease issues are brought to the attention of a litigation lawyer only after a dispute between the landlord and the tenant has erupted. Oftentimes, the dispute involves the 'boilerplate' provisions that do not raise much interest during the drafting phase because they are not considered to be economic deal points. <i>See</i> 'Revisiting Boilerplate or 'Miscellaneous' Lease Provisions' in the January 2006 issue of <i>Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy</i>. This lack of interest in boilerplate provisions is a mistake because it is much easier to resolve concerns regarding those provisions ' which become very important in the litigation context ' while the parties are amicably moving toward closing a deal, rather than during the pendency of a lawsuit. Many times, disputes could have been either avoided or minimized had the parties clarified certain important issues while they were negotiating and drafting. This article discusses several leasing issues that should be carefully considered while the parties are still on friendly terms.
In the Spotlight: Assignment and Subletting Provisions Rock Your World
September 28, 2006
In the entire universe of legal and business terms that makes up the modern-day commercial lease, there are very few provisions that can change the world of the landlord or tenant. One of those world-changing provisions is the assignment and subletting provision.
Finding Uncertainty in Certain Damage Provisions
September 28, 2006
For years, careful landlords and tenants have used liquidated damages as a means to avoid the uncertainty of events beyond their control. If the tenant held over beyond its term, or the landlord breached the tenant's exclusive, liquidated damages were considered a dependable remedy to avoid costly and time-consuming litigation. Unfortunately, what seems certain to lease drafters is anything but certain when presented in court. A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia underscores that point.
