Are Law Firm 'Partners' Really 'Employees'?
August 28, 2003
Law firm management often assumes that some attorneys, such as partners, shareholders and of counsels, are not covered by various civil rights statutes, <i>eg</i>, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). As firms which have been sued by such attorneys or which have faced broad Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigations have learned, however, such assumptions are often not well founded.
Bye Bye Billables?
August 19, 2003
The concept of value-based fees for legal services is generating a steady buzz in the legal marketplace. Debate, discussion, reports and articles abound as attorneys and their law firms try to figure out if there is a better compensation model than the billable hour.
Taking the Fifth in Document Production
August 18, 2003
This is part two of a two part article. Clients subpoenaed by the government or private litigants rarely want to disclose their documents. They reflexively assert that it is all personal, confidential or proprietary. However, they are often surprised to learn that most documents are not protected from disclosure by the Fifth Amendment privilege. There is an entire body of case law that narrowly restricts the protection of the Fifth Amendment privilege in document production, which can be a trap for the unwary.
'Up-the-Ladder' Responsibilities Clarified by Sarbanes-Oxley
August 16, 2003
As discussed on page 1 of this newsletter, the SEC recently issued 'Standards of Professional Conduct' for attorneys representing issuers before the SEC ' a new rule mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. <i>See</i> 15 U.S.C. ' 7201 <i>et. seq.</i> The Standards clarify an attorney's 'up-the-ladder' corporate reporting responsibilities imposed by the Act. 17 C.F.R. ' 205.
How to Extinguish a Lessee's Possessory Interest
August 15, 2003
The ability of a trustee to sell bankruptcy estate assets free and clear of competing interests in the property has long been recognized as one of the most important advantages of a bankruptcy filing as a vehicle for restructuring a debtor's balance sheet and generating value. Still, section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, which delineates the circumstances under which an asset can be sold free and clear of 'any interest in such property,' has generated a fair amount of controversy. This is so because the statute itself does not define 'interest.'
Enron Probe Examines Firms' Roles
August 13, 2003
The Enron examiner is back. And a few law firms can't be too happy about it. R. Neal Batson, the court-appointed examiner investigating the exotic financing schemes that contributed to the Enron Corp.'s bankruptcy, publicly released his much-anticipated second report on March 5.
Ancillary Businesses: Assessing Their Overhead Costs
August 13, 2003
Editor's note: In February's edition of the A&FP newsletter, an article and accompanying worksheet provided an overview of various law firm resources that might need to be committed to a proposed ancillary business. That article focused on how an ancillary business might unexpectedly challenge the physical, financial or service resources of the law firm. This month's article examines somewhat the reverse issue: financial strains on the ancillary business that could unexpectedly result from its association with the law firm.
Managing 70%
August 12, 2003
Imagine the CEO of a major international corporation saying to her Board of Directors, 'We are doing a great job of managing 70% of our productive capacity.' And the Board responding, 'Great job, here's your bonus.' Or another CEO who says, 'We don't need to hire managers for our regional plants, because 70% of our capacity is in the main plant anyway. Let the others do what they want.' Hard to imagine, isn't it? Of course it is, because the concept of ignoring 30% of your business' productive capacity ' leaving it to 'manage itself' or, worse, considering it unimportant ' would get you fired in any business in the world.
Building a Comp Plan That Works
August 12, 2003
On a recent visit to Altman Weil management consultants in Newtown Square, PA, I met with James D. Cotterman, a longtime contributor to (and just-retiring Editorial Board member of) this newsletter. Jim was the lead author and editor of both the 2nd and 3rd editions of the ABA-published book <i>Compensation Plans for Law Firms</i>. Regrettably I can't share with you Altman Weil's excellent hazelnut coffee, but I hope you'll enjoy the following condensed excerpts from our conversation about Jim's book. With Jim's concurrence, I've also prettied up my sketched notes on some compensation system and profitability interrelationships explained in the book; these flow diagrams appear on pages 2 and 5.
