Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


IP News
September 01, 2003
Highlights of the latest intellectual property news and cases from around the country.
Use of an Invention: 'Anticipating'?
September 01, 2003
Under U.S. patent law, an inventor is entitled to a patent if the invention is useful, novel, and nonobvious. The "novelty" prong of this tripartite test is controlled by 35 U.S.C. '102, which defines the "prior art" (<i>ie,</i> already existing technology) that can "anticipate," or render non-novel, the invention. In general, an invention sought to be patented is anticipated when it already exists in the prior art, having been placed there either by a third party or through the inventor's own actions. Under '102, prior use of the invention can anticipate a patent in certain circumstances. Specifically, the statute states that: "A person shall be entitled to a patent unless (a) the invention was ... used by others ... before the invention thereof by the applicant ...; or (b) the invention was ... in public use ... more than one year prior to the date of the application.
Analyzing Provisional Rights for Patent Applicants
September 01, 2003
With the passage of the Domestic Publication of Foreign Filed Patent Applications Act of 1999, the U.S. Congress instituted a pre-grant patent publication system. As a result, the USPTO must now publish domestic utility patent applications filed on or after November 29, 2000 within 18 months of their earliest priority date, unless conditions for preventing publication are met.
Costs of Being Public Rise 90% under Sarbanes-Oxley
September 01, 2003
<b><i>A New Study Confirms What Has Been Thought All Along</i></b> Costs directly associated with being public have almost doubled as a result of Sarbanes-Oxley (the Act), with more increases on the way, according to a study by our national law firm, Foley &amp; Lardner. The rise in costs, which affects all public companies regardless of market capitalization or revenue, largely is driven by increases in accounting fees, director and officer insurance premiums, and legal fees.
Compliance Hotline
September 01, 2003
Recent key cases of importance to your practice.
When Should an Audit Committee Consider Independent Counsel?
September 01, 2003
As widely reported and discussed since July 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) imposes a substantial number of new responsibilities on the audit committee of a public company required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act. This article discusses those responsibilities.
Consequences for FCPA Compliance
September 01, 2003
<b><i>What Sarbanes-Oxley Has WroughtPart One of a Two-Part Article</i></b>We all know by now that the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation was designed to strengthen corporate governance of publicly traded companies in the wake of Enron and other corporate accounting and fraud scandals of recent years. Its focus was principally on domestic corporate conduct. However, in just the short time since its enactment in 2002, the Act has begun to have a profound impact on other areas of corporate compliance and risk management as well.
Releasing the Albatross
September 01, 2003
In the context of large Chapter 11 cases, the resolution of disputed claims can often be the proverbial albatross around the neck of the debtor, delaying the closing of the debtor's case to the detriment of the debtor's estate.
The Effect of Bankruptcy on a Subchapter S Election
September 01, 2003
A new tax case from the U.S. Tax Court addresses the question of whether the filing of a Chapter 11 case by a Subchapter S corporation terminates the company's Subchapter S election. This case is important to the shareholders of a Subchapter S corporation that might have post-petition taxable income.
'Personal' Alter Ego Claims in Bankruptcy
September 01, 2003
Last month's article discussed the unfortunate fact that bankruptcy courts have made it virtually impossible for creditors to maintain individual alter ego claims against the debtor's shareholders and affiliates - and that as a result, crafting an alter ego claim that will survive an attack requires finesse. This month's article continues with a discussion of "personal" claims.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
    With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›