Employee Reassignments Under the ADA
April 25, 2008
The United States Supreme Court was poised this term to decide an important issue arising under the Americans With Disabilities Act ('ADA') that has vexed employers for years. At issue was whether the ADA requires employers to reassign an employee who, due to a disability, can no longer perform the essential functions of his position, to a vacant, equivalent position for which he is qualified or whether the disabled employer must merely permit the employee to compete for such a position with other applicants. Unfortunately, the case of <i>Huber v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</i> settled after the Supreme Court had granted certiorari to decide this issue, leaving an existing split among the circuits.
FRCP 26(f): Use a Map, Ask for Directions or Fly Blind?
March 28, 2008
In the quickly evolving world of e-discovery, the time to figure out and understand the organization's ESI is speeding by. The FRCP amendments and the courts that enforce them (both Federal and State) no longer provide a grace period where attorneys and litigants can 'fly blind' regarding ESI and figure things out as they go. If corporate counsel or supporting outside counsel is unsure of how to identify, preserve or collect ESI for a pending matter or in the overall course of conducting business, the time to ask for directions is now.
Think It's Found Money?
March 28, 2008
When a business needs to raise money it may consider hiring a 'finder,' which is normally a consultant that helps the company find investors in the business. The company should proceed with caution in retaining a finder due to the regulated nature of its business, and there are several 'market' terms in a written Finder's Fee Agreement that the company should insist upon.
Airing a Board's Dirty Laundry
March 28, 2008
The fallout from Hewlett-Packard's ('HP') controversial boardroom leak investigation has led to a variety of actions ' including an investigation by the California Attorney General's office and Congressional hearings on the practice of 'pretexting' ' a tactic employed by Hewlett-Packard to gain the confidential phone records of board members. Despite the considerable press attention devoted to the incident, it is an otherwise under-the-radar action by the SEC that could have the greatest long-term impact on corporate governance and compliance.
Drafting Market-Based MAC and Termination Fee Clauses
March 28, 2008
Two types of contract clauses are commonly cited when a buyer or financing source desires not to make good on its commitment. These clauses are material adverse change (MAC) clauses and termination fee clauses. Several recent cases show that good draftsmanship and a clear understanding of their intended effect are essential in heading off disputes when implementing these provisions.
Quarterly State Compliance Review
March 28, 2008
This edition of the Quarterly State Compliance Review includes a look at legislation of interest to corporate lawyers, that recently went into effect in Delaware and California, and a look at recent decisions of interest dealing with derivative suits from the high courts of Delaware, New York and California.
The Cost of Security
March 28, 2008
With the ever-increasing focus on security, wage and hour class actions create potential liability for a variety of employers, from airport vendors to power plants to retailers. Fortunately for these employers and others, the recent, yet limited, case law has held that such time is not compensable. Moreover, general wage and hour principles support this conclusion.
Delaware Chancery Dismisses Globis v. Plumtree
February 26, 2008
While Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173,184 (Del. 1986) places paramount importance on directors' duty to seek the highest sale price once the board of directors determines their corporation is for sale, the fact that plaintiffs simply point to a less-than-ideal purchase price is not sufficient under Delaware law to trigger heightened scrutiny of the directors' actions during the sale process.
The Microsoft Decision
February 26, 2008
Microsoft's recent decision not to appeal the landmark ruling of the European Court of First Instance (CFI) regarding anti-competitive practices provides an opportunity for reflection and analysis. An assessment of the Microsoft saga for technology and other IP-rich businesses depends upon a clear understanding of what the European Commission and the CFI decided and, perhaps even more importantly, what they did not decide.
Counseling Corporations on Execution
February 26, 2008
Senior executives realize that they do not know how to change the firm's ability to execute their business plan and at some point search for some way to devise a successful plan that the current organization can implement. It is often unrecognized that the source of the disappointing performance is the corporation's failure to execute its current strategy.
