Litigation Readiness
January 31, 2007
With the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), precedent-setting adverse sanctions against some of the largest corporations and growing regulatory requirements, the need to become 'litigation ready' has been like a large snowball, gaining mass and momentum. The indisputable need to become litigation ready has arrived, and the snowball continues to get bigger and faster as it heads down the mountain. With the FRCP amendments, Dec. 1 has come and gone and guess what? Nothing has exploded.
The McNulty Memo
January 31, 2007
On Dec. 12, 2006 the U.S. Justice Department issued new guidance that will require federal prosecutors to seek approval from senior DOJ officials before requesting a waiver of attorney-client privilege and work product protection in corporate criminal investigations. The new guidance supersedes the existing language on waiver in the 'Thompson memo,' issued by then-Deputy Attorney General Larry D. Thompson in January 2003.
Is 'Culture' Part of Counsel's Job?
December 26, 2006
Corporate counsels' ethical obligations are primarily seen as directing the corporation to comply with the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Typically, the more amorphous concept of corporate 'culture' has been left to the auspices of human resources. New empirical evidence suggests that corporate culture plays a defining role in whether an organization conducts business in an ethical manner and that corporate counsel need to be part of assessing and changing that…
Enforcing Jurisdiction Clauss in the EU
December 26, 2006
In a recent development that will likely be of interest to companies conducting business in Europe, the American Bar Association has recently urged the U.S. government to sign, ratify and implement the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (the 'Choice of Court Convention'). The Choice of Court Convention accomplishes many goals that have long been sought by the United States. Most importantly, it provides a mechanism for the recognition of certain judgments rendered by U.S. courts, namely judgments resolving a dispute arising out of a commercial agreement that was submitted pursuant to an exclusive choice of court agreement. (See American Bar Association, Recommendation adopted by the House of Delegates (Aug. 7-8, 2006), at www.abanet.org/intlaw/policy/investment/hcca0806.pdf.)
Last Call for Non-Proportionate Bar Orders
December 26, 2006
The means by which courts implement bar orders in securities class actions continue to evolve. Currently, courts use three widely recognized methods to calculate the judgment reduction credit given to a non-settling defendant who is barred from pursuing contribution claims from a settling defendant. One method, pro rata, has already lost favor in the courts and in the near future, the second method, pro tanto, will most likely fall from grace as well. In contrast to the first two, the last method, proportionate fault, is rising in popularity due to its greater likelihood of leading to equitable results. It is, therefore, last call to those seeking to have their bar order filled by anything other than the proportionate fault method.
The Growth of Litigation: A Global Trend
December 26, 2006
For the past three years, our law firm, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, has conducted its Litigation Trends Survey, based on responses from senior-level in-house lawyers at companies in a variety of industries and at various revenue levels. In the first year, we surveyed only United States companies. Last year, we expanded our survey to encompass companies in the United Kingdom as well. This year's edition of the Litigation Trends Survey ' in recognition of the increasing globalization of the world economy and our own firm's rapid international expansion ' drew on responses from companies around the world. The survey results generally confirmed what prompted us to expand the scope of the Survey to begin with ' that companies are increasingly operating more globally and therefore face greater and more frequent challenges in protecting their interests in areas far from home.
BearingPoint and the Risk of Late SEC Filings
December 26, 2006
Companies that are late in filing their financial statements with the SEC may simultaneously trigger default provisions under their credit agreements and indentures. Accounting problems from practices such as the backdating of stock options make it difficult for companies to get auditors to sign off on their financial statements, resulting not only in a failure to meet SEC reporting deadlines but also a default under their loan agreements and cross-defaults under other agreements. This problem is widespread, with over 150 companies affected by the options backdating scandals and over 1300 companies in 2005 alone filing restatements of their financial statements with the SEC.
Base Salaries Up; Bonus Levels Mixed
November 28, 2006
The recently released 2006 Altman Weil Law Department Compensation Benchmarking Survey of U.S. corporate law departments, published in partnership with LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell, shows base salaries up across the board for in-house lawyers in 2006.
New Federal Discovery Rules: A Compliance Roadmap
November 28, 2006
Revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have likely gone into effect as you read this. They place a very early focus on existing retention practices and the preservation and discovery of information. For companies without modern enterprise retention programs and robust legal holds processes, a thoughtful gap analysis and readiness plan should be completed immediately.
Employers Beware EEOC Information Request
November 28, 2006
Understandably, companies have become more sensitive about protecting confidential, proprietary business information from disclosure to competitors and others outside the company.<br>A recent ruling by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, <i>Venetian Casino Report v. EEOC</i>, 2006 WL 2806568 (D.D. Cir. 2006), demonstrates that such disclosures may occur in the most unexpected ways.
