'Save As Privileged' ' The Next e-Discovery Answer?
January 03, 2006
In general, the proposed rules will increase awareness of the discovery issues that are unique to electronic discovery and will require that the lawyers, the parties and the court focus early on the format in which electronic data will be produced in federal actions. Also, absent unusual circumstances, the new rules will protect parties from sanctions for failure to produce electronic data lost by routine, good faith loss of data and will protect parties from the need to produce inaccessible data under some circumstances.
Compelling Private Company Employee Information
January 03, 2006
There has been much recent press about the USA Patriot Act, and in particular the seemingly unlimited power of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to issue National Security Letters (NSLs) as part of its efforts to combat terrorism (under 18 U.S.C. '2709). NSLs are a form of administrative subpoena issued by the FBI upon self-certification and are shrouded in a cloak of secrecy. Specifically, Section 2709 permits the FBI to demand the production of certain records where the FBI certifies that the materials are sought to "protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities." On a more controversial note, Section 2709 also contains a gag provision, which prohibits the recipient of an NSL from ever disclosing that the FBI has sought or obtained information pursuant to an NSL. To date, Section 2709 has received little judicial scrutiny, with reported controversies focusing on NSLs issued to Internet Service Providers and libraries. Now, NSLs are being issued to private corporations, with the FBI demanding the production of records regarding employees.
EEOC Issues Q&A on Cancer in the Workplace
January 03, 2006
Earlier this year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued a set of questions and answers about cancer in the workplace and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).<br>The Q&A does not contain much in the way of new information, but rather gives examples that help illustrate the position the EEOC will take on issues regarding cancer as a disability. Since these are the types of issues that often puzzle human resources managers ' and land on the desk of in-house counsel ' the EEOC's Q&A serves to provide some assistance on how to handle these issues.
Hotline
January 03, 2006
Employer cannot make assumptions in "regarded as disabled" casesThe Fifth Circuit has ruled that an employer may not maintain a blanket policy to deny…
The Best of MLF 2005: Looking Back at the 'Benchmark' Year
November 30, 2005
Well, it's been an exciting year here at <i>Marketing the Law Firm</i>. As with past practice, this month's issue will be a look back at the year that was. In this issue we will present February (the January issue recaps part of 2004) through July.
What In The World Is Going On With Lawyer Retirement Planning?
November 30, 2005
In Part One, the author provided an overview of what lawyers (and their firms) were doing about retirement planning, including a discussion on firms that do not use unfunded obligations ' The First Camp. Part Two examines firms that use unfunded retirement obligations, and the current trends in partner retirement planning.
Sarbanes-Oxley Versus The Attorney-Client Privilege
November 29, 2005
Ironically, the SEC and the Department of Justice, which enforce SOX's criminal provisions, appear ready to burden the traditional ethical obligations of corporate legal counselors to keep client communications confidential in an effort to police the integrity and ethics of other corporate gatekeepers. To that end, the SEC imposes certain reporting requirements on corporate counselors, attempts to preempt state ethics rules, and DOJ prosecutors routinely pressure "target" corporations to waive the attorney-client privilege to obtain "cooperation" points. Corporate counselors must be aware of those initiatives to properly balance their competing obligations.
When Does A Workday Begin? When Does It End?
November 29, 2005
These relatively simple questions are not always easy to answer, particularly when they pertain to pay issues under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). On Nov. 8, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court provided some needed clarification in two consolidated cases ' IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez and Tum v. Barber Foods, Inc.
The Right To Copy ' and Use ' Unprotected Product Designs Is Alive And Well
November 29, 2005
The Seventh Circuit has reaffirmed a competitor's right to copy and use unprotected product designs ' and clarified the ability to do so without violating the Lanham Act for "passing off" or trade dress infringement. <i>Bretford Mfg., Inc. v. Smith System Mfg., Corp.</i> This article examines the legal precedent behind the right to copy and use unprotected product designs in the context of this case, and provide analysis of its impact.
Class Action Waivers in California: Discover Bank and Employment Arbitration
November 29, 2005
It is a matter of significant controversy and a subject of much litigation whether the U.S. Supreme Court's Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) jurisprudence enforcing pre-dispute arbitration agreements, regardless of whether the underlying dispute derives from contract, statute or public policy, extends to situations where individuals seek to bring class claims on behalf of large groups either in court or before the arbitral tribunal. Mostly, the decisions have supported this extension, provided the arbitration agreement authorizes the decision-maker to apply statutory as well as contract law and to award statutory remedies for proven violations. Because plaintiffs' lawyers have responded to these developments by bringing class claims in arbitration, despite silence in the underlying agreement whether the arbitrator possesses "class certification" authority, a number of companies have inserted express class action waivers in their arbitration programs. A recent decision of the California Supreme Court places in question the legal effectiveness of this response, at least in that state and for "consumer"-type claims.
