Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In contemporary American society, a college education is increasingly being seen as necessary to maintaining a decent standard of living. While many parents assume some responsibility for contributing to their child's post-secondary educational expenses, the situation for divorced parents is more complex. This article discusses several points related to this issue. First, under what circumstance may a court order a divorced parent to pay for the college expenses of his or her child? Second, if a parent agrees to provide such support, what are the practical considerations that should be addressed in the agreement?
A Question of State Law
Whether or not a court can impose an obligation to pay college expenses upon a divorced parent depends on state law. Approximately one-third of the states have case law or statutes that provide for the imposition of such expenses upon a divorced parent. States have utilized several methods to accomplish this end. In some states, it has been held that a court can exercise its equitable powers to provide for support of a child beyond the age of majority and that college expenses can be included as a part of the child-support obligation. Several states have specific statutory provisions that allow for the imposition of post-majority education subsidy for “good cause” or “where deemed appropriate.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?