Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The early days of 2003 have brought a stark reminder to the leaders of law firms. While strong law firms have experienced an exceptional level of prosperity and growth in a consolidating market, continued expansion and ever increasing profitability are not the only potential destinies for law firms today. As the high profile closures of long established firms such as Brobeck; Peterson & Ross; Hill & Barlow and others demonstrate anew, firms can fail. And with failure come career interruption, client uncertainty and financial distress for many.
Recent dissolutions reinforce the fact that law firms are fragile enterprises. If not carefully and constantly renewed and developed, they are in danger of falling apart, often rather quickly. In reality, in spite of appearances of rapid failure, the seeds of collapse are generally sown long in advance ' in most cases, even long before the firm begins to noticeably decline (eg, as seen in the form of firm shrinkage or lowered profitability). The lessons learned from dissolving firms offer leaders an opportunity to avoid seeing their firms consigned to the dustbins of history ' if properly focused and motivated, there is almost always time to intervene and change a firm's direction, before it is faced with a final crisis.
Of course, leaders must know where to focus their efforts. There is no simple list of things that drive a firm to failure, and in most situations the underlying problems are many and complexly interwoven. In general, the sources of failure come from three overriding areas, and usually from more than one simultaneously. These are:
If management can act to strengthen these areas early on, they can often limit their problems and bring the firm back to a prosperous track.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.