Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Birth Injury Claims Most Successful

By Janice G. Inman
April 01, 2003

Jury Verdict Research' has just released its report, Current Trends in Personal Injury — 2002 Edition. The research company maintains a nationwide database of verdicts and settlements in personal injury claims. Its recently released report identifies and summarizes current award trends and breaks down the awards by type of case and injury.

The study notes that while median compensatory jury awards in medical malpractice cases rose more than 40% in 2000, such awards remained relatively stagnant from 2001 to 2002: $1 million.

Overall, plaintiffs won claims against doctors and other health care providers 39% of the time, meaning that most of the cases brought were unsuccessful. Not surprisingly, the medical malpractice plaintiffs who won most often were those with claims of malpractice-related birth injuries. They won 53% of their cases. Plaintiffs suing for surgical negligence were successful 44% of the time and plaintiffs claiming diagnostic negligence won 38% of the time.

Compared with other areas of personal injury liability, such as premises liability and liability related to vehicular accidents, medical malpractice plaintiffs were less likely to win their cases. For example, plaintiffs whose cases involved injury from auto and other vehicular accidents were successful 68% of the time. Median plaintiff awards based on data compiled by the study for cases concluded between 1995 and 2001 were:

  • Brain damage: $4.5 million
  • Cancer: $1.1 million
  • Eye injuries: $585,805
  • Genital injuries: $274,960
  • Leg injuries: $646,000
  • Paralysis: $3.5 million

Copies of the study are available for purchase at the company's Web site at www.juryverdictresearch.com or by telephone at 1-800-341-7874.


Janice G. Inman, Esq.,

Jury Verdict Research' has just released its report, Current Trends in Personal Injury — 2002 Edition. The research company maintains a nationwide database of verdicts and settlements in personal injury claims. Its recently released report identifies and summarizes current award trends and breaks down the awards by type of case and injury.

The study notes that while median compensatory jury awards in medical malpractice cases rose more than 40% in 2000, such awards remained relatively stagnant from 2001 to 2002: $1 million.

Overall, plaintiffs won claims against doctors and other health care providers 39% of the time, meaning that most of the cases brought were unsuccessful. Not surprisingly, the medical malpractice plaintiffs who won most often were those with claims of malpractice-related birth injuries. They won 53% of their cases. Plaintiffs suing for surgical negligence were successful 44% of the time and plaintiffs claiming diagnostic negligence won 38% of the time.

Compared with other areas of personal injury liability, such as premises liability and liability related to vehicular accidents, medical malpractice plaintiffs were less likely to win their cases. For example, plaintiffs whose cases involved injury from auto and other vehicular accidents were successful 68% of the time. Median plaintiff awards based on data compiled by the study for cases concluded between 1995 and 2001 were:

  • Brain damage: $4.5 million
  • Cancer: $1.1 million
  • Eye injuries: $585,805
  • Genital injuries: $274,960
  • Leg injuries: $646,000
  • Paralysis: $3.5 million

Copies of the study are available for purchase at the company's Web site at www.juryverdictresearch.com or by telephone at 1-800-341-7874.


Janice G. Inman, Esq., New York

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.