Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cases in Court
HealthSouth Executives Implicated in Government Probe
Guilty pleas have been entered for the first time under new Sarbanes-Oxley Provisions. On April 5, 2003, the New York Times reported that Richard Scrushy, former Chief Executive Officer for HealthSouth Corporation, the largest provider of diagnostic imaging, outpatient surgery, and rehabilitation services with locations in 50 states and abroad, has been targeted by regulators for allegedly helping to overstate the company's earnings by more than $2 billion during the past 6 years. Bill Hicks, an SEC attorney, was quoted as stating that Scrushy “could be forced to pay $785 million or more if he loses a government lawsuit accusing him and the company of fraud,” and that “[i]t could go up if we find more insider trading or more profiting from the fraud.” Eight former HealthSouth executives have plead guilty so far, including pleas from both a former and the current financial officer of the chain in late March 2003, under the new Sarbanes-Oxley measures. See “Sarbanes Oxley Claims First CFO,” SmartPros (March 28, 2003).
Property of California Ambulance Operators Seized
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?