Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that interest on non-dischargeable child support obligations is also not dischargeable, and continues to accrue after a Chapter 13 petition is filed. In so ruling, the court affirmed decisions by the Bankruptcy Court and the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Foster v. Bradbury (In re Foster), No. 01-56890 (Feb. 7).
In this particular case, the father's claim was paid in full and his Chapter 13 case closed 2 days before the county sent a wage assignment to his employer, requiring the employer to withhold $100 per month to pay off the $2000 interest that had accrued after the father had filed his original bankruptcy petition. The father filed a motion arguing that the post-petition interest was dischargeable in bankruptcy. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in favor of the county and the district court affirmed.
On review, the circuit court likened post-petition interest on non-dischargeable child support obligations in Chapter 13 bankruptcies to non-dischargeable tax debts in Chapter 11 and 12 bankruptcies; according to the court, like the latter, post-petition interest on support obligations may be recovered personally against a debtor who has received a discharge on the underlying debt.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?