Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
According to a report issued by the Internet Fraud Compliant Center, an organization led by the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, fraudulent activity on the Internet surged dramatically last year.
The Complaint Center said it received 48,252 complaints of fraud, compared with 16,775 complaints in 2001, citing its second annual report that covered January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. In all, 46% of the complaints regarded auction fraud, the most reported offense last year. Other complaints, including nondelivery of merchandise and credit and debit card fraud, also ranked high on the list.
Complaints of business, investment, and confidence fraud, as well as identity theft, round out the top seven types of complaints reported, each at 1% or more of the total fraudulent activities reported.
The total dollar loss of Internet fraud reported to the center in 2002 was $54 million, compared with $17 million the year before. Authorities believe that number of cases referred for prosecution hardly reflects the scope of actual criminal activity.
At $3,864, the “Nigerian Letter” scam tops the list as the highest median dollar loss for victims. (The “Nigerian Letter” scam is an e-mailed form letter from an alleged Nigerian national who claims to be the relative of a high-ranking exile who essentially needs someone to launder a few million dollars. The fraud comes in with the fact that the writer asks for wire instructions to the recipient's bank account, ostensibly the place in which the money would be deposited, and a nice-sized commission could be withdrawn as payment for services. Of course, the money would not be deposited and instead the recipient's bank account was zapped.) The median cost for victims of identity theft and check fraud was $2,000 and $1,100, respectively. The median cost for victims of auction fraud was $320 and merchandise nondelivery was $176.
The report omitted statistics on how many complaints received by the Internet fraud center resulted in criminal convictions last year.
Wire reports contributed to this article.
According to a report issued by the Internet Fraud Compliant Center, an organization led by the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, fraudulent activity on the Internet surged dramatically last year.
The Complaint Center said it received 48,252 complaints of fraud, compared with 16,775 complaints in 2001, citing its second annual report that covered January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. In all, 46% of the complaints regarded auction fraud, the most reported offense last year. Other complaints, including nondelivery of merchandise and credit and debit card fraud, also ranked high on the list.
Complaints of business, investment, and confidence fraud, as well as identity theft, round out the top seven types of complaints reported, each at 1% or more of the total fraudulent activities reported.
The total dollar loss of Internet fraud reported to the center in 2002 was $54 million, compared with $17 million the year before. Authorities believe that number of cases referred for prosecution hardly reflects the scope of actual criminal activity.
At $3,864, the “Nigerian Letter” scam tops the list as the highest median dollar loss for victims. (The “Nigerian Letter” scam is an e-mailed form letter from an alleged Nigerian national who claims to be the relative of a high-ranking exile who essentially needs someone to launder a few million dollars. The fraud comes in with the fact that the writer asks for wire instructions to the recipient's bank account, ostensibly the place in which the money would be deposited, and a nice-sized commission could be withdrawn as payment for services. Of course, the money would not be deposited and instead the recipient's bank account was zapped.) The median cost for victims of identity theft and check fraud was $2,000 and $1,100, respectively. The median cost for victims of auction fraud was $320 and merchandise nondelivery was $176.
The report omitted statistics on how many complaints received by the Internet fraud center resulted in criminal convictions last year.
Wire reports contributed to this article.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.