Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
According to a report issued by the Internet Fraud Compliant Center, an organization led by the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, fraudulent activity on the Internet surged dramatically last year.
The Complaint Center said it received 48,252 complaints of fraud, compared with 16,775 complaints in 2001, citing its second annual report that covered January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. In all, 46% of the complaints regarded auction fraud, the most reported offense last year. Other complaints, including nondelivery of merchandise and credit and debit card fraud, also ranked high on the list.
Complaints of business, investment, and confidence fraud, as well as identity theft, round out the top seven types of complaints reported, each at 1% or more of the total fraudulent activities reported.
The total dollar loss of Internet fraud reported to the center in 2002 was $54 million, compared with $17 million the year before. Authorities believe that number of cases referred for prosecution hardly reflects the scope of actual criminal activity.
At $3,864, the “Nigerian Letter” scam tops the list as the highest median dollar loss for victims. (The “Nigerian Letter” scam is an e-mailed form letter from an alleged Nigerian national who claims to be the relative of a high-ranking exile who essentially needs someone to launder a few million dollars. The fraud comes in with the fact that the writer asks for wire instructions to the recipient's bank account, ostensibly the place in which the money would be deposited, and a nice-sized commission could be withdrawn as payment for services. Of course, the money would not be deposited and instead the recipient's bank account was zapped.) The median cost for victims of identity theft and check fraud was $2,000 and $1,100, respectively. The median cost for victims of auction fraud was $320 and merchandise nondelivery was $176.
The report omitted statistics on how many complaints received by the Internet fraud center resulted in criminal convictions last year.
Wire reports contributed to this article.
According to a report issued by the Internet Fraud Compliant Center, an organization led by the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, fraudulent activity on the Internet surged dramatically last year.
The Complaint Center said it received 48,252 complaints of fraud, compared with 16,775 complaints in 2001, citing its second annual report that covered January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002. In all, 46% of the complaints regarded auction fraud, the most reported offense last year. Other complaints, including nondelivery of merchandise and credit and debit card fraud, also ranked high on the list.
Complaints of business, investment, and confidence fraud, as well as identity theft, round out the top seven types of complaints reported, each at 1% or more of the total fraudulent activities reported.
The total dollar loss of Internet fraud reported to the center in 2002 was $54 million, compared with $17 million the year before. Authorities believe that number of cases referred for prosecution hardly reflects the scope of actual criminal activity.
At $3,864, the “Nigerian Letter” scam tops the list as the highest median dollar loss for victims. (The “Nigerian Letter” scam is an e-mailed form letter from an alleged Nigerian national who claims to be the relative of a high-ranking exile who essentially needs someone to launder a few million dollars. The fraud comes in with the fact that the writer asks for wire instructions to the recipient's bank account, ostensibly the place in which the money would be deposited, and a nice-sized commission could be withdrawn as payment for services. Of course, the money would not be deposited and instead the recipient's bank account was zapped.) The median cost for victims of identity theft and check fraud was $2,000 and $1,100, respectively. The median cost for victims of auction fraud was $320 and merchandise nondelivery was $176.
The report omitted statistics on how many complaints received by the Internet fraud center resulted in criminal convictions last year.
Wire reports contributed to this article.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.