Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With surprising alacrity, the New York State Legislature followed the lead of the New York City Council by banning smoking in all respects in the workplace, and went further by eliminating some of the few exceptions present in the City law applicable to restaurants and bars. Governor George Pataki signed the bill within hours of receiving it from the Legislature. The new law, which takes effect in late July, is one of the strictest state smoking bans in the country.
The New York State law prohibits smoking in all enclosed areas within public places, including public transportation facilities, public means of mass transportation (such as subway cars and all underground areas of subway stations, buses, vans, taxis, car services, and limousines), public rest rooms, retail stores (with the exception of tobacco stores), and restaurants (subject to the outdoor exemptions discussed below).
Also included are business establishments such as banks, financial institutions or other offices where professional, consumer, religious or not-for-profit services are located (eg, doctors' offices, dentists' offices, and counseling services offices), libraries, museums and galleries, movie theatres and concert halls, as well as buildings used primarily for exhibitions, stage, music and dance, lecture or other such performances, auditoriums, convention halls, sports arenas and recreation areas (including all stadiums, race tracks, billiard parlors or any such other places where the public assembles to either exercise or to participate in or witness any sports or recreational activity).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.