Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tax Foreclosure Sales: What Notice Is Due?
To what extent does the increasing availability of information change statutory or constitutional obligations to provide notice of tax foreclosure proceedings? In Kennedy v. Mossafa (infra, page '), decided last month, the Court of Appeals did not recognize any significant change in law, despite the greater ease with which a municipality makes efforts to locate absent property owners. Whether intervening technological advances, or the Supreme Court, will bring changes to this area of law remains to be seen.
The basic problem is simple. A landowner fails to pay taxes. The municipality seeks to foreclose. What efforts must the municipality make to apprise the owner of the foreclosure proceedings? Historically, courts treated notice by publication as adequate, because the proceeding was “in rem“. The Supreme Court's opinion in Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 US 791, together with the Court of Appeals' opinion in McCann v. Scaduto, 71 NY2d 164, marked the end of the traditional approach. As the Court of Appeals put it in holding unconstitutional an already repealed “notice by publication” scheme, “where the interest of a property owner will be substantially affected by an act of government, and where the owner's name and address are known, due process requires that actual notice be given.” McCann v. Scaduto, 71 NY2d at 176. Actual notice, in this context, means notice “by letter.” Id. at 178.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.