Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Finding of Marriage Insufficient to Elect Against Will
In Re Estate of Joseph Kalinowski PICS Case No. 03-0605 (Pa. Super. April 24, 2003) Memorandum (11 pages)
Finding scarce evidence of a common law marriage, a Pennsylvania Superior Court panel ruled that the live-in companion of a deceased resident of Carbon County cannot elect against his last will and testament as a surviving spouse. Joseph Kalinowski died testate in November 2001, leaving his estate to his son, Joseph Kalinowski Jr. His live-in companion, Constance Contino, petitioned Carbon County Orphan's Court to elect to take against the will as Kalinowski's common law surviving spouse. She claimed that the two had privately exchanged marital vows in their living room in 1996.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.