Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Eight registered nurses who underwent pre-employment medical examinations were instead sexually harassed, according to a proposed Consent Decree submitted to Judge Leonard Sand by the EEOC and Lutheran Medical Center. Under the terms of the proposed settlement reached by the parties, the medical center has agreed to pay $5.425 million dollars to compensate the nurses and other female nurses similarly harassed. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lutheran Medical Center, 01 CV 5494 (E.D.N.Y.) (Raggi, D. J.).
Conrado Ponio, MD, was the medical center's physician who performed medical examinations for newly hired registered nurses and those returning from leave for the period of 1996 to 2000. The EEOC alleged in its complaint that Ponio had the authority to clear employees for employment. The agency further alleged that Ponio sexually harassed the eight nurses, as well as others, in the context of this medical exam, and threatened the nurses that if they did not acquiesce to his unwelcome sexual conduct, their employment would be delayed or denied. The EEOC contended that during the period from November 1999 to January 2000, Ponio required these nurses to submit to breast and vaginal exams that included his touching and probing their genitals without wearing latex gloves. Ponio allegedly also required the nurses to respond to irrelevant sexual and personal questions such as their use of contraception and their dating status.
The complaint alleged that a female employee complained about Ponio's sexual harassment in July 1999, but that the medical center took no preventive measures to safeguard against further harassment by the doctor. In particular, the agency claims that the hospital failed to investigate the complaint to determine whether other female employees were similarly harassed, or in any other way limit Ponio's unfettered ability to abuse his authority.
Under the Consent Decree, Lutheran Medical Center, in addition to paying monetary damages, agreed to revise its anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policies, and its pre-employment physical examinations. Also, the medical center agreed to revise its training program relating to discrimination and harassment issues.
Eight registered nurses who underwent pre-employment medical examinations were instead sexually harassed, according to a proposed Consent Decree submitted to Judge Leonard Sand by the EEOC and Lutheran Medical Center. Under the terms of the proposed settlement reached by the parties, the medical center has agreed to pay $5.425 million dollars to compensate the nurses and other female nurses similarly harassed.
Conrado Ponio, MD, was the medical center's physician who performed medical examinations for newly hired registered nurses and those returning from leave for the period of 1996 to 2000. The EEOC alleged in its complaint that Ponio had the authority to clear employees for employment. The agency further alleged that Ponio sexually harassed the eight nurses, as well as others, in the context of this medical exam, and threatened the nurses that if they did not acquiesce to his unwelcome sexual conduct, their employment would be delayed or denied. The EEOC contended that during the period from November 1999 to January 2000, Ponio required these nurses to submit to breast and vaginal exams that included his touching and probing their genitals without wearing latex gloves. Ponio allegedly also required the nurses to respond to irrelevant sexual and personal questions such as their use of contraception and their dating status.
The complaint alleged that a female employee complained about Ponio's sexual harassment in July 1999, but that the medical center took no preventive measures to safeguard against further harassment by the doctor. In particular, the agency claims that the hospital failed to investigate the complaint to determine whether other female employees were similarly harassed, or in any other way limit Ponio's unfettered ability to abuse his authority.
Under the Consent Decree, Lutheran Medical Center, in addition to paying monetary damages, agreed to revise its anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policies, and its pre-employment physical examinations. Also, the medical center agreed to revise its training program relating to discrimination and harassment issues.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.