Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
New York's highest court, the Court of Appeals, threw a lifeline to abused and neglected children with a powerful ruling that streamlines the adoption process and makes it easier to terminate parental rights in the most severe cases. In an opinion by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye, the court said the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) applies retroactively, and therefore officials do not have to make a diligent effort to reunite families before permanently removing children. Also, and perhaps most significantly, the court said that Family Court can rely on derivative findings of abuse – where, for instance, a child witnesses the abuse of a sibling but is not himself or herself attacked – even though such proof is not explicitly recognized in the ASFA.
The decision appears to eliminate potential hurdles that could have prevented or delayed the permanent rescue of children from abusive or neglectful parents. It is not clear how the ruling will be applied in matters with less egregious fact patterns.
Matter of Marino S., Jr.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?