Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Around the Firms

By Teri Zucker
August 01, 2003

No Cooley Orrick Merger

Last month, sources revealed that Cooley Godward and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe have abandoned merger talks. The firms had been in discussion since the beginning of 2003. Firm leaders would not give a confirmation either way. As far as the search for merger partners goes, Orrick is thinking about acquiring Venture Law Group, a corporate boutique based in Menlo Park, CA, with which it has had a client-sharing agreement for approximately 4 years. Though the status of discussion between the two firms is unclear, last May, a United Kingdom publication was told by Craig Johnson, Venture Law's co-founder, that the two firms had discussed a possible union.


But Cooley Does Have New Counsel

Late in July, Cooley Godward LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, let it be known that it has instituted a new position: The firm's first pro bono counsel is Maureen Alger, a resident in the Palo Alto office. She is responsible for the expansion and improvement of the firmwide pro bono practice. A Columbia Law School graduate, she joined the firm four years ago having previously held a clerkship with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Cooley Godward's chairman and chief executive officer, Stephen Neal praised Alger's efforts, and said that the growth of the practice will strengthen the firm's pro bonus services ' an vital part of Cooley's dealings and culture.


Altheimer Nears the End

Chicago's Altheimer & Gray, 88 years old, is due to close its doors by Nov. 1. However, there has been some speculation regarding the reason for the firm's demise. Staff memos have placed the blame on a slackening of corporate mergers. But another view comes from six attorneys connected in one way or another with the firm, and this is that while the economy has caused suffrage, it is not entirely the reason for the closing. It seems that although the firm had been trying to trim, too many long-term partners who were failing to yield sufficient profits were being retained at payment levels that were too high. A former partner, who departed early this year, said that Altheimer faced the recent loss of many good attorneys ' some who were just the kind the firm needed in order to advance. Altheimer also faced the departure of several key partners during the past few years and also had a poor overseas performance. But although 24 equity partners left between 1998 and 2002, there was an increase in profits per partner ($410,000 in 1998 to $570,000 in 2000). According to affiliate publication The American Lawyer, last year this evened out at $505,000. An attorney privy to the firm's business dealings revealed that 2 years ago, Altheimer tried unsuccessfully to effect a merger partner in New York. A firm partner stated that while Altheimer had sufficient assets to cover its debt – said to be $30 million ' the cash flow was not enough to meet monthly payroll for approximately 9,000 employees. There was another theory reported in The American Lawyer and elsewhere, though current and former partners downplayed it. This was that partner Gerry Chico's shift in focus from firm business to politics (his 2004 Senate campaign) caused attrition in the firm's government relations practice. Supposedly this particular practice had an advantage with the political connections of Chico, who once was chief of staff to Richard M. Daley, Chicago's mayor.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.