Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Avoiding Criminal Tax Prosecution of the Client with Foreign Accounts
Your client Jane Doe, the distraught business executive who hopes you can assist her in avoiding a criminal tax prosecution arising from her offshore bank accounts, calls you to inquire about the status of her case. While vacationing in the Caribbean several years ago, she opened accounts for herself and her company at a bank located on Grand Cayman Island. The bank issued her credit and debit cards linked to the offshore accounts, thereby enabling her convenient access to her offshore funds from the United States. In recent years, Jane's personal income tax returns, as well as those of her company, have failed to disclose the offshore accounts or to report the interest earned on them. Nor did she or her company file the required forms reporting those foreign financial accounts. Although Jane had not received any contact from the Internal Revenue Service prior to her engaging your services, she had heard news reports that the IRS had been gathering information about thousands of U.S. taxpayers with credit and debit cards issued by banks in the Caribbean, and she had feared that it was just a matter of time before the IRS would come calling.
Fortunately for Jane and her company, at the time she retained you in late December 2002 the IRS had recently announced significant changes to its voluntary disclosure program. See Business Crimes Bulletin, January 2003. A month later, the IRS announced its Offshore Voluntary Compliance Initiative (OVCI), which incorporated its newly revised voluntary disclosure policy and offered taxpayers such as Jane a possible golden opportunity to avoid criminal prosecution as well as significant civil penalties in exchange for their filing amended tax returns and cooperating with the IRS in its enforcement program against promoters of offshore tax shelters. Jane followed your advice to request participation in the OVCI program before the announced deadline of April 15, 2003. Subsequently, the IRS notified her of its preliminary determination of her eligibility.
What are the risks that your client still faces? What are the benefits? Have you rendered the correct advice? To serve your client properly, you must understand the seriousness of the situation, analyze the possible responses to IRS inquiries, and decide upon the best strategy to pursue in light of IRS and Department of Justice enforcement priorities, practices, procedures, and policies.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?